Re: [PATCH 19/24] sh: use __iomem pointers for MMIO

2012-09-18 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 18 September 2012, Paul Mundt wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:34:47PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > ARM is moving to stricter checks on readl/write functions, > > so we need to use the correct types everywhere. > > > > I'm not completely sure about this patch, and it will > >

Re: [PATCH 19/24] sh: use __iomem pointers for MMIO

2012-09-18 Thread Paul Mundt
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:34:47PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > ARM is moving to stricter checks on readl/write functions, > so we need to use the correct types everywhere. > > I'm not completely sure about this patch, and it will > probably require some arch/sh changes to go along with it, >

Re: [PATCH 19/24] sh: use __iomem pointers for MMIO

2012-09-18 Thread Paul Mundt
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:34:47PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: ARM is moving to stricter checks on readl/write functions, so we need to use the correct types everywhere. I'm not completely sure about this patch, and it will probably require some arch/sh changes to go along with it, but it's

Re: [PATCH 19/24] sh: use __iomem pointers for MMIO

2012-09-18 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 18 September 2012, Paul Mundt wrote: On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:34:47PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: ARM is moving to stricter checks on readl/write functions, so we need to use the correct types everywhere. I'm not completely sure about this patch, and it will probably

[PATCH 19/24] sh: use __iomem pointers for MMIO

2012-09-14 Thread Arnd Bergmann
ARM is moving to stricter checks on readl/write functions, so we need to use the correct types everywhere. I'm not completely sure about this patch, and it will probably require some arch/sh changes to go along with it, but it's clear that something has to be done to avoid getting hundreds of new

[PATCH 19/24] sh: use __iomem pointers for MMIO

2012-09-14 Thread Arnd Bergmann
ARM is moving to stricter checks on readl/write functions, so we need to use the correct types everywhere. I'm not completely sure about this patch, and it will probably require some arch/sh changes to go along with it, but it's clear that something has to be done to avoid getting hundreds of new