On Tuesday 18 September 2012, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:34:47PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > ARM is moving to stricter checks on readl/write functions,
> > so we need to use the correct types everywhere.
> >
> > I'm not completely sure about this patch, and it will
> >
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:34:47PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> ARM is moving to stricter checks on readl/write functions,
> so we need to use the correct types everywhere.
>
> I'm not completely sure about this patch, and it will
> probably require some arch/sh changes to go along with it,
>
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:34:47PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
ARM is moving to stricter checks on readl/write functions,
so we need to use the correct types everywhere.
I'm not completely sure about this patch, and it will
probably require some arch/sh changes to go along with it,
but it's
On Tuesday 18 September 2012, Paul Mundt wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:34:47PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
ARM is moving to stricter checks on readl/write functions,
so we need to use the correct types everywhere.
I'm not completely sure about this patch, and it will
probably
ARM is moving to stricter checks on readl/write functions,
so we need to use the correct types everywhere.
I'm not completely sure about this patch, and it will
probably require some arch/sh changes to go along with it,
but it's clear that something has to be done to avoid
getting hundreds of new
ARM is moving to stricter checks on readl/write functions,
so we need to use the correct types everywhere.
I'm not completely sure about this patch, and it will
probably require some arch/sh changes to go along with it,
but it's clear that something has to be done to avoid
getting hundreds of new
6 matches
Mail list logo