On Apr 2 2007 15:50, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
>On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 09:04 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On Apr 2 2007 14:49, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
>> >
>> >Not too sure about this, the default palette is based on ANSI/ECMA
>> >standards (at least for the first 8 colors). Also, this will ha
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 09:04 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Apr 2 2007 14:49, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> >
> >Not too sure about this, the default palette is based on ANSI/ECMA
> >standards (at least for the first 8 colors). Also, this will have subtle
> >effects on the 16-color logo. Since your
On Apr 2 2007 14:49, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
>
>Not too sure about this, the default palette is based on ANSI/ECMA
>standards (at least for the first 8 colors). Also, this will have subtle
>effects on the 16-color logo. Since your first patch already allows us
>to change the palette, let's leave
On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 20:14 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> Have the Linux kernel set a new VGA palette for the first 16 colors.
> The new values reduce the saturation (white component) and therefore
> increase contrast.
>
> Already posted once: http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/1/15/149
>
> Signed-off-by
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
Have the Linux kernel set a new VGA palette for the first 16 colors.
The new values reduce the saturation (white component) and therefore
increase contrast.
While the patch seems fine, this comment is not correct. The patch is
decreasing the *brightness* in order to *in
Have the Linux kernel set a new VGA palette for the first 16 colors.
The new values reduce the saturation (white component) and therefore
increase contrast.
Already posted once: http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/1/15/149
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
vt.c | 12 ++--
1 fil
6 matches
Mail list logo
