Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: da7218: Correct IRQ level in DT binding example

2017-11-20 Thread Rob Herring
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 03:09:28PM +, Adam Thomson wrote: > Current DT binding documentation shows an example where the IRQ > for the device is chosen to be ACTIVE_HIGH. This is incorrect as > the device only supports ACTIVE_LOW, so this commit fixes that > discrepancy. > > Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: da7218: Correct IRQ level in DT binding example

2017-11-20 Thread Rob Herring
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 03:09:28PM +, Adam Thomson wrote: > Current DT binding documentation shows an example where the IRQ > for the device is chosen to be ACTIVE_HIGH. This is incorrect as > the device only supports ACTIVE_LOW, so this commit fixes that > discrepancy. > > Signed-off-by:

[PATCH 2/2] ASoC: da7218: Correct IRQ level in DT binding example

2017-11-17 Thread Adam Thomson
Current DT binding documentation shows an example where the IRQ for the device is chosen to be ACTIVE_HIGH. This is incorrect as the device only supports ACTIVE_LOW, so this commit fixes that discrepancy. Signed-off-by: Adam Thomson ---

[PATCH 2/2] ASoC: da7218: Correct IRQ level in DT binding example

2017-11-17 Thread Adam Thomson
Current DT binding documentation shows an example where the IRQ for the device is chosen to be ACTIVE_HIGH. This is incorrect as the device only supports ACTIVE_LOW, so this commit fixes that discrepancy. Signed-off-by: Adam Thomson --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/da7218.txt | 2 +-