On 25/01/21 22:01, Sean Christopherson wrote:
I 100% think that VMX and SVM should share the bulk of the
code. Improvements to VMX almost always apply in some way to SVM, and vice
versa.
I agree.
IMO, after debugging a few times, associating
error_code with the event being injected is
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 14:27 -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > I still don't see why VMX can't share this with SVM. "npt' can easily be
> > "tdp",
> > differentiating between VMCB and VMCS can be down with ISA, and VMX can
> > give 0
> > for
On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 14:27 -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > This is very helpful to debug nested VMX issues.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/trace.h | 30 ++
> >
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> This is very helpful to debug nested VMX issues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/trace.h | 30 ++
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 5 +
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c| 3 ++-
> 3 files
This is very helpful to debug nested VMX issues.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky
---
arch/x86/kvm/trace.h | 30 ++
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 5 +
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c| 3 ++-
3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
5 matches
Mail list logo