[PATCH 2/2] Made core dump functionality optional

2012-08-03 Thread Alex Kelly
From: Alex Adds an expert Kconfig option, CONFIG_COREDUMP, which allows disabling of core dump. This saves approximately 2.6k in the compiled kernel, and complements CONFIG_ELF_CORE, which now depends on it. CONFIG_COREDUMP also disables coredump-related sysctls, except for suid_dumpable and

[PATCH 2/2] Made core dump functionality optional

2012-08-03 Thread Alex Kelly
From: Alex esh...@gmail.com Adds an expert Kconfig option, CONFIG_COREDUMP, which allows disabling of core dump. This saves approximately 2.6k in the compiled kernel, and complements CONFIG_ELF_CORE, which now depends on it. CONFIG_COREDUMP also disables coredump-related sysctls, except for

[PATCH 2/2] Made core dump functionality optional

2012-07-31 Thread Alex Kelly
From: Alex Adds an expert Kconfig option, CONFIG_COREDUMP, which allows disabling of core dump. This saves approximately 2.6k in the compiled kernel, and complements CONFIG_ELF_CORE, which now depends on it. CONFIG_COREDUMP also disables coredump-related sysctls, except for suid_dumpable and

[PATCH 2/2] Made core dump functionality optional

2012-07-31 Thread Alex Kelly
From: Alex esh...@gmail.com Adds an expert Kconfig option, CONFIG_COREDUMP, which allows disabling of core dump. This saves approximately 2.6k in the compiled kernel, and complements CONFIG_ELF_CORE, which now depends on it. CONFIG_COREDUMP also disables coredump-related sysctls, except for

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Made core dump functionality optional

2012-07-12 Thread Cong Wang
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 13:22 -0700, Alex Kelly wrote: > Sorry it took me so long to reply to this: > > 1. *Should* I change the option to CONFIG_CORE_DUMP ? I agree with Josh > that in terms of the existing codebase, either way makes sense, but I'll > defer to your judgment if you think I should

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Made core dump functionality optional

2012-07-12 Thread Cong Wang
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 13:22 -0700, Alex Kelly wrote: Sorry it took me so long to reply to this: 1. *Should* I change the option to CONFIG_CORE_DUMP ? I agree with Josh that in terms of the existing codebase, either way makes sense, but I'll defer to your judgment if you think I should change