On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:46 AM, Alexander Drozdov wrote:
>
> On 19.03.2015 21:50:03 +0300 Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Alexander Drozdov
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:29:32 -0400, Willem de Bruijn
>>> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at
On 19.03.2015 21:50:03 +0300 Willem de Bruijn wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Alexander Drozdov wrote:
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:29:32 -0400, Willem de Bruijn
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Alexander Drozdov
wrote:
Introduce TP_STATUS_CSUM_VALID tp_status flag to tell the
On 19.03.2015 21:50:03 +0300 Willem de Bruijn wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Alexander Drozdov al.droz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:29:32 -0400, Willem de Bruijn will...@google.com
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Alexander Drozdov al.droz...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:46 AM, Alexander Drozdov al.droz...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19.03.2015 21:50:03 +0300 Willem de Bruijn wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Alexander Drozdov al.droz...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:29:32 -0400, Willem de Bruijn will...@google.com
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Alexander Drozdov wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:29:32 -0400, Willem de Bruijn
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Alexander Drozdov
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Introduce TP_STATUS_CSUM_VALID tp_status flag to tell the
>>> af_packet user that at least the
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:29:32 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Alexander Drozdov wrote:
Introduce TP_STATUS_CSUM_VALID tp_status flag to tell the
af_packet user that at least the transport header checksum
has been already validated.
This changes the interface
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Alexander Drozdov wrote:
> Introduce TP_STATUS_CSUM_VALID tp_status flag to tell the
> af_packet user that at least the transport header checksum
> has been already validated.
This changes the interface slightly. Processes should be treating
this previously
Introduce TP_STATUS_CSUM_VALID tp_status flag to tell the
af_packet user that at least the transport header checksum
has been already validated.
For now, the flag may be set for incoming packets only.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Drozdov
---
include/uapi/linux/if_packet.h | 1 +
Introduce TP_STATUS_CSUM_VALID tp_status flag to tell the
af_packet user that at least the transport header checksum
has been already validated.
For now, the flag may be set for incoming packets only.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Drozdov al.droz...@gmail.com
---
include/uapi/linux/if_packet.h | 1 +
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:29:32 -0400, Willem de Bruijn will...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Alexander Drozdov al.droz...@gmail.com wrote:
Introduce TP_STATUS_CSUM_VALID tp_status flag to tell the
af_packet user that at least the transport header checksum
has been already
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Alexander Drozdov al.droz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:29:32 -0400, Willem de Bruijn will...@google.com
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Alexander Drozdov al.droz...@gmail.com
wrote:
Introduce TP_STATUS_CSUM_VALID tp_status flag to tell
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Alexander Drozdov al.droz...@gmail.com wrote:
Introduce TP_STATUS_CSUM_VALID tp_status flag to tell the
af_packet user that at least the transport header checksum
has been already validated.
This changes the interface slightly. Processes should be treating
this
12 matches
Mail list logo