On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 16:29:24 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> On 07/16/2012 03:40 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:35:54 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> >> The function has no parameter @len now, so need to remove it from
> >> comments to avoid kernel-doc warning:
> >
> > But it still
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 16:29:24 +0800, Alex Shi alex@intel.com wrote:
On 07/16/2012 03:40 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:35:54 +0800, Alex Shi alex@intel.com wrote:
The function has no parameter @len now, so need to remove it from
comments to avoid kernel-doc
On 07/16/2012 04:29 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
> On 07/16/2012 03:40 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:35:54 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>>> The function has no parameter @len now, so need to remove it from
>>> comments to avoid kernel-doc warning:
>>
>> But it still does in my tree.
>>
On 07/16/2012 04:29 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
On 07/16/2012 03:40 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:35:54 +0800, Alex Shi alex@intel.com wrote:
The function has no parameter @len now, so need to remove it from
comments to avoid kernel-doc warning:
But it still does in my tree.
On 07/16/2012 03:40 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:35:54 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>> The function has no parameter @len now, so need to remove it from
>> comments to avoid kernel-doc warning:
>
> But it still does in my tree.
>
> Please push this patch via whoever changed it?
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:35:54 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> The function has no parameter @len now, so need to remove it from
> comments to avoid kernel-doc warning:
But it still does in my tree.
Please push this patch via whoever changed it?
Acked-by: Rusty Russell
Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:35:54 +0800, Alex Shi alex@intel.com wrote:
The function has no parameter @len now, so need to remove it from
comments to avoid kernel-doc warning:
But it still does in my tree.
Please push this patch via whoever changed it?
Acked-by: Rusty Russell
On 07/16/2012 03:40 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:35:54 +0800, Alex Shi alex@intel.com wrote:
The function has no parameter @len now, so need to remove it from
comments to avoid kernel-doc warning:
But it still does in my tree.
Please push this patch via whoever
The function has no parameter @len now, so need to remove it from
comments to avoid kernel-doc warning:
alexs@debian:~/linux-next$ scripts/kernel-doc -man
include/linux/cpumask.h | split-man.pl /tmp/man
Creating /tmp/man/cpumask_scnprintf.9
Warning(include/linux/cpumask.h:602): Excess
The function has no parameter @len now, so need to remove it from
comments to avoid kernel-doc warning:
alexs@debian:~/linux-next$ scripts/kernel-doc -man
include/linux/cpumask.h | split-man.pl /tmp/man
Creating /tmp/man/cpumask_scnprintf.9
Warning(include/linux/cpumask.h:602): Excess
10 matches
Mail list logo
