Re: [PATCH 2/2] extend clone_flags using parent_tidptr argument

2008-02-05 Thread Cedric Le Goater
Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:24:16 -0600 "Serge E. Hallyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Quoting Cedric Le Goater ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): From: Cedric Le Goater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> We have at least 2 patchsets requiring each a new clone flag and there it is, we've reached the limit,

Re: [PATCH 2/2] extend clone_flags using parent_tidptr argument

2008-02-04 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 14:24:16 -0600 "Serge E. Hallyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting Cedric Le Goater ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > From: Cedric Le Goater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > We have at least 2 patchsets requiring each a new clone flag and there it > > is, we've reached the limit, none are

Re: [PATCH 2/2] extend clone_flags using parent_tidptr argument

2008-02-04 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
Quoting Cedric Le Goater ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > From: Cedric Le Goater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > We have at least 2 patchsets requiring each a new clone flag and there it > is, we've reached the limit, none are left. > This patch uses the CLONE_DETACHED flag (unused) as a marker to extend the Ar

[PATCH 2/2] extend clone_flags using parent_tidptr argument

2008-02-04 Thread Cedric Le Goater
From: Cedric Le Goater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> We have at least 2 patchsets requiring each a new clone flag and there it is, we've reached the limit, none are left. This patch uses the CLONE_DETACHED flag (unused) as a marker to extend the clone flags through the parent_tidptr argument. Initia