On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Looks like something like below fixes the issue.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
>
> 8< ---
> From: Tony Lindgren
> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 16:13:46 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] gpio: of: Fix handling for deferred probe for -gpio suffix
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:14:23PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Tony Lindgren [140602 16:06]:
> > * Linus Walleij [140425 00:53]:
> > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Thierry Reding
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Thierry Reding
> > > >
> > > > Many bindings use the -gpio suffix in prope
* Tony Lindgren [140602 16:06]:
> * Linus Walleij [140425 00:53]:
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Thierry Reding
> > wrote:
> >
> > > From: Thierry Reding
> > >
> > > Many bindings use the -gpio suffix in property names. Support this in
> > > addition to the -gpios suffix when requesting
* Linus Walleij [140425 00:53]:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Thierry Reding
> wrote:
>
> > From: Thierry Reding
> >
> > Many bindings use the -gpio suffix in property names. Support this in
> > addition to the -gpios suffix when requesting GPIOs using the new
> > descriptor-based API.
> >
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 04/24/2014 12:22 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> ...
>> The downside of not allowing the gpiod API to support the -gpio suffix
>> is that we'll never be able to convert drivers that use such a binding
>> and will forever have a hodgepodge of
On 04/24/2014 12:22 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
...
> The downside of not allowing the gpiod API to support the -gpio suffix
> is that we'll never be able to convert drivers that use such a binding
> and will forever have a hodgepodge of GPIO APIs that we need to support.
Perhaps rather than making
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding
>
> Many bindings use the -gpio suffix in property names. Support this in
> addition to the -gpios suffix when requesting GPIOs using the new
> descriptor-based API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding
It appears this
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Linus Walleij
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Thierry Reding
>> wrote:
>>
>>> From: Thierry Reding
>>>
>>> Many bindings use the -gpio suffix in property names. Support this in
>>> addition to
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 09:06:24AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Linus Walleij
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Thierry Reding
> > wrote:
> >
> >> From: Thierry Reding
> >>
> >> Many bindings use the -gpio suffix in property names. Support this in
> >
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Thierry Reding
> wrote:
>
>> From: Thierry Reding
>>
>> Many bindings use the -gpio suffix in property names. Support this in
>> addition to the -gpios suffix when requesting GPIOs using the new
>> descripto
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding
>
> Many bindings use the -gpio suffix in property names. Support this in
> addition to the -gpios suffix when requesting GPIOs using the new
> descriptor-based API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding
Are the DT bindi
From: Thierry Reding
Many bindings use the -gpio suffix in property names. Support this in
addition to the -gpios suffix when requesting GPIOs using the new
descriptor-based API.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 18 --
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+),
12 matches
Mail list logo
