Re: [PATCH 2/2] kprobes: compile out IPMODIFY support if ftrace doesn't support it

(2015/01/14 17:48), Jiri Kosina wrote: > If ftrace doesn't claim to support IPMODIFY support, there is no need to > compile IPMODIFY support in kprobes either. > This looks good to me :) Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu Thanks! > Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina > --- > kernel/kprobes.c | 8

[PATCH 2/2] kprobes: compile out IPMODIFY support if ftrace doesn't support it

If ftrace doesn't claim to support IPMODIFY support, there is no need to compile IPMODIFY support in kprobes either. Suggested-by: Masami Hiramatsu Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina --- kernel/kprobes.c | 8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c

Re: [PATCH 2/2] kprobes: compile out IPMODIFY support if ftrace doesn't support it

(2015/01/14 17:48), Jiri Kosina wrote: If ftrace doesn't claim to support IPMODIFY support, there is no need to compile IPMODIFY support in kprobes either. This looks good to me :) Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com Thanks! Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina

[PATCH 2/2] kprobes: compile out IPMODIFY support if ftrace doesn't support it

If ftrace doesn't claim to support IPMODIFY support, there is no need to compile IPMODIFY support in kprobes either. Suggested-by: Masami Hiramatsu masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina jkos...@suse.cz --- kernel/kprobes.c | 8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4