On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:29:41AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 10/23/2012 01:57 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > Does this work with boards where we don't have any MMC supplies? Or are
> > we just deferring the probe indefinitely there?
> > For boards that power MMC unconditionally, are we
On 10/23/2012 01:57 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 23.10.2012, 12:49 +0530 schrieb Pavan Kunapuli:
>> vmmc and vqmmc regulators control the voltage to
>> the host and device. Defer the probe if either of
>> them is not registered.
>
> Does this work with boards where we don't have any
On 10/23/2012 01:18 AM, Pavan Kunapuli wrote:
> vmmc and vqmmc regulators control the voltage to
> the host and device. Defer the probe if either of
> them is not registered.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavan Kunapuli
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 25 ++---
> 1 files changed,
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:21:58PM +0200, Philip Rakity wrote:
> On 23 Oct 2012, at 09:19, Pavan Kunapuli wrote:
> > - /* If vqmmc regulator and no 1.8V signalling, then there's no UHS */
> > + /*
> > +* If vqmmc regulator and no 1.8V signalling, then there's no UHS.
> > +* vqmmc
On 23 Oct 2012, at 09:19, Pavan Kunapuli wrote:
> vmmc and vqmmc regulators control the voltage to
> the host and device. Defer the probe if either of
> them is not registered.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavan Kunapuli
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 25 ++---
> 1 files
-...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci: Defer probe if regulator_get fails
I didn't understand why defer the probe?
I think that some board can't control vqmmc or vmmc.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
On 10/23/2012 04:18 PM, Pavan Kunapuli wrote:
> vmmc and vqmmc regulators control the volt
I didn't understand why defer the probe?
I think that some board can't control vqmmc or vmmc.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
On 10/23/2012 04:18 PM, Pavan Kunapuli wrote:
> vmmc and vqmmc regulators control the voltage to
> the host and device. Defer the probe if either of
> them is not registered.
Sent: 23 October 2012 13:27
To: Pavan Kunapuli
Cc: swar...@wwwdotorg.org; li...@arm.linux.org.uk; c...@laptop.org;
linux-te...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci: Defer probe if regulato
Am Dienstag, den 23.10.2012, 12:49 +0530 schrieb Pavan Kunapuli:
> vmmc and vqmmc regulators control the voltage to
> the host and device. Defer the probe if either of
> them is not registered.
>
Does this work with boards where we don't have any MMC supplies? Or are
we just deferring the probe
vmmc and vqmmc regulators control the voltage to
the host and device. Defer the probe if either of
them is not registered.
Signed-off-by: Pavan Kunapuli
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 25 ++---
1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
vmmc and vqmmc regulators control the voltage to
the host and device. Defer the probe if either of
them is not registered.
Signed-off-by: Pavan Kunapuli
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 25 ++---
1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
vmmc and vqmmc regulators control the voltage to
the host and device. Defer the probe if either of
them is not registered.
Signed-off-by: Pavan Kunapuli pkunap...@nvidia.com
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 25 ++---
1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff
vmmc and vqmmc regulators control the voltage to
the host and device. Defer the probe if either of
them is not registered.
Signed-off-by: Pavan Kunapuli pkunap...@nvidia.com
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 25 ++---
1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff
Am Dienstag, den 23.10.2012, 12:49 +0530 schrieb Pavan Kunapuli:
vmmc and vqmmc regulators control the voltage to
the host and device. Defer the probe if either of
them is not registered.
Does this work with boards where we don't have any MMC supplies? Or are
we just deferring the probe
To: Pavan Kunapuli
Cc: swar...@wwwdotorg.org; li...@arm.linux.org.uk; c...@laptop.org;
linux-te...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci: Defer probe if regulator_get fails
Am Dienstag, den
I didn't understand why defer the probe?
I think that some board can't control vqmmc or vmmc.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
On 10/23/2012 04:18 PM, Pavan Kunapuli wrote:
vmmc and vqmmc regulators control the voltage to
the host and device. Defer the probe if either of
them is not registered.
-...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci: Defer probe if regulator_get fails
I didn't understand why defer the probe?
I think that some board can't control vqmmc or vmmc.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
On 10/23/2012 04:18 PM, Pavan Kunapuli wrote:
vmmc and vqmmc regulators control the voltage
On 23 Oct 2012, at 09:19, Pavan Kunapuli pkunap...@nvidia.com wrote:
vmmc and vqmmc regulators control the voltage to
the host and device. Defer the probe if either of
them is not registered.
Signed-off-by: Pavan Kunapuli pkunap...@nvidia.com
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 25
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:21:58PM +0200, Philip Rakity wrote:
On 23 Oct 2012, at 09:19, Pavan Kunapuli pkunap...@nvidia.com wrote:
- /* If vqmmc regulator and no 1.8V signalling, then there's no UHS */
+ /*
+* If vqmmc regulator and no 1.8V signalling, then there's no UHS.
+*
On 10/23/2012 01:18 AM, Pavan Kunapuli wrote:
vmmc and vqmmc regulators control the voltage to
the host and device. Defer the probe if either of
them is not registered.
Signed-off-by: Pavan Kunapuli pkunap...@nvidia.com
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 25 ++---
1
On 10/23/2012 01:57 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 23.10.2012, 12:49 +0530 schrieb Pavan Kunapuli:
vmmc and vqmmc regulators control the voltage to
the host and device. Defer the probe if either of
them is not registered.
Does this work with boards where we don't have any MMC
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:29:41AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 10/23/2012 01:57 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
Does this work with boards where we don't have any MMC supplies? Or are
we just deferring the probe indefinitely there?
For boards that power MMC unconditionally, are we supposed to
22 matches
Mail list logo
