On 06/17/2013 03:12 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 10:06 PM, wrote:
From: David Daney
We need to pick up the definition of raw_smp_processor_id() from
asm/smp.h. For the !SMP case, we need to supply a
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 10:06 PM, wrote:
>> From: David Daney
>>
>> We need to pick up the definition of raw_smp_processor_id() from
>> asm/smp.h. For the !SMP case, we need to supply a definition of
>> raw_smp_processor_id().
>
>
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:07 AM, David Howells wrote:
> ddaney.c...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>> -#include
>> +/* linux/smp.h <- linux/irqflags.h needs asm/smp.h first */
>> +#include
>> #endif
>
> If you make this change, is the #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ still necessary, I
>
ddaney.c...@gmail.com wrote:
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> -#include
> +/* linux/smp.h <- linux/irqflags.h needs asm/smp.h first */
> +#include
> #endif
If you make this change, is the #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ still necessary, I
wonder...
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 10:06 PM, wrote:
> From: David Daney
>
> We need to pick up the definition of raw_smp_processor_id() from
> asm/smp.h. For the !SMP case, we need to supply a definition of
> raw_smp_processor_id().
Thanks, this fixes the build!
> Signed-off-by: David Daney
Acked-by:
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 10:06 PM, ddaney.c...@gmail.com wrote:
From: David Daney david.da...@cavium.com
We need to pick up the definition of raw_smp_processor_id() from
asm/smp.h. For the !SMP case, we need to supply a definition of
raw_smp_processor_id().
Thanks, this fixes the build!
ddaney.c...@gmail.com wrote:
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
-#include linux/smp.h
+/* linux/smp.h - linux/irqflags.h needs asm/smp.h first */
+#include asm/smp.h
#endif
If you make this change, is the #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ still necessary, I
wonder...
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:07 AM, David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote:
ddaney.c...@gmail.com wrote:
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
-#include linux/smp.h
+/* linux/smp.h - linux/irqflags.h needs asm/smp.h first */
+#include asm/smp.h
#endif
If you make this change, is the #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 10:06 PM, ddaney.c...@gmail.com wrote:
From: David Daney david.da...@cavium.com
We need to pick up the definition of raw_smp_processor_id() from
asm/smp.h. For the !SMP case, we need to
On 06/17/2013 03:12 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 10:06 PM, ddaney.c...@gmail.com wrote:
From: David Daney david.da...@cavium.com
We need to pick up the definition of
From: David Daney
We need to pick up the definition of raw_smp_processor_id() from
asm/smp.h. For the !SMP case, we need to supply a definition of
raw_smp_processor_id().
Signed-off-by: David Daney
---
arch/mn10300/include/asm/irqflags.h | 3 ++-
arch/mn10300/include/asm/smp.h | 1 +
2
From: David Daney david.da...@cavium.com
We need to pick up the definition of raw_smp_processor_id() from
asm/smp.h. For the !SMP case, we need to supply a definition of
raw_smp_processor_id().
Signed-off-by: David Daney david.da...@cavium.com
---
arch/mn10300/include/asm/irqflags.h | 3 ++-
12 matches
Mail list logo