On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 17:20 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
>> Having the function name indicate what the function is used
>> for makes the code a little easier to read. Furthermore,
>> the fault handling code largely consists of do__page
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Peter Zijlstra a.p.zijls...@chello.nl wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 17:20 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
Having the function name indicate what the function is used
for makes the code a little easier to read. Furthermore,
the fault handling code largely consists of
* Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 10/19/2012 07:41 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 17:20 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >>Having the function name indicate what the function is used
> >>for makes the code a little easier to read. Furthermore,
> >>the fault handling code largely
On 10/19/2012 07:41 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 17:20 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
Having the function name indicate what the function is used
for makes the code a little easier to read. Furthermore,
the fault handling code largely consists of do__page
functions.
I
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 17:20 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Having the function name indicate what the function is used
> for makes the code a little easier to read. Furthermore,
> the fault handling code largely consists of do__page
> functions.
I don't much care either way, but I was
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 17:20 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
Having the function name indicate what the function is used
for makes the code a little easier to read. Furthermore,
the fault handling code largely consists of do__page
functions.
I don't much care either way, but I was thinking
On 10/19/2012 07:41 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 17:20 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
Having the function name indicate what the function is used
for makes the code a little easier to read. Furthermore,
the fault handling code largely consists of do__page
functions.
I
* Rik van Riel r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/19/2012 07:41 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 17:20 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
Having the function name indicate what the function is used
for makes the code a little easier to read. Furthermore,
the fault handling code largely
Having the function name indicate what the function is used
for makes the code a little easier to read. Furthermore,
the fault handling code largely consists of do__page
functions.
Rename the NUMA fault handling functions to indicate what
they are used for.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel
---
Having the function name indicate what the function is used
for makes the code a little easier to read. Furthermore,
the fault handling code largely consists of do__page
functions.
Rename the NUMA fault handling functions to indicate what
they are used for.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel
10 matches
Mail list logo