Feel free to add to the pair:
Acked-by: Dave Hansen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Paul E. McKenney
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 04:52:05PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Sat, 7 Feb 2015 12:09:48 -0800
>> "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
>>
>> >The tag sequence has the meaning of:
>> > git cherry-pick a1f84a3
>> > git cherry-pick
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 04:52:05PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Feb 2015 12:09:48 -0800
> "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
>
> >The tag sequence has the meaning of:
> > git cherry-pick a1f84a3
> > git cherry-pick 1b9508f
> > git cherry-pick fd21073
> > git
On Sat, 7 Feb 2015 12:09:48 -0800
"Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
>The tag sequence has the meaning of:
> git cherry-pick a1f84a3
> git cherry-pick 1b9508f
> git cherry-pick fd21073
> git cherry-pick
>
> Does that do what you need?
Note, for this case it really doesn't
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Paul E. McKenney
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 10:20:02AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Sat, 7 Feb 2015 09:01:34 +0100
>> Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>
>>
>> > - Tested-by's
>> > - Reference of 2/2 to 1/2
>>
>> The two are together in the series and fix two
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 10:20:02AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Feb 2015 09:01:34 +0100
> Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
>
> > - Tested-by's
> > - Reference of 2/2 to 1/2
>
> The two are together in the series and fix two different bugs. They do
> not need to reference each other.
>
> > -
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Feb 2015 09:01:34 +0100
> Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
>
>> - Tested-by's
>> - Reference of 2/2 to 1/2
>
> The two are together in the series and fix two different bugs. They do
> not need to reference each other.
>
>> - CC: stable
On Sat, 7 Feb 2015 09:13:23 +0100
Sedat Dilek wrote:
I fell over this w/o having any experiences in using the tracing
> system within the Linux-kernel.
> Can you give a brief introduction?
> Or can describe how you made your tests?
> Did you use trace-cmd in your tests?
>
>
Some of the tests
On Sat, 7 Feb 2015 09:01:34 +0100
Sedat Dilek wrote:
> - Tested-by's
> - Reference of 2/2 to 1/2
The two are together in the series and fix two different bugs. They do
not need to reference each other.
> - CC: stable v3.17+/v3.18+ ? (1/2 has a hint for backporting in case
> of 3.17+ which is
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 5:02 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:27:54 -0800
> "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
>
>> > Reported-by: Sedat Dilek
>> > Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney
>> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt
>>
>> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney
>
> Both patches survived all my
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 5:02 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:27:54 -0800
> "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
>
>> > Reported-by: Sedat Dilek
>> > Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney
>> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt
>>
>> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney
>
> Both patches survived all my
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 5:02 AM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:27:54 -0800
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Reported-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com
Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Steven
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 5:02 AM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:27:54 -0800
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Reported-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com
Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Steven
On Sat, 7 Feb 2015 09:01:34 +0100
Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
- Tested-by's
- Reference of 2/2 to 1/2
The two are together in the series and fix two different bugs. They do
not need to reference each other.
- CC: stable v3.17+/v3.18+ ? (1/2 has a hint for backporting in case
On Sat, 7 Feb 2015 09:13:23 +0100
Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
I fell over this w/o having any experiences in using the tracing
system within the Linux-kernel.
Can you give a brief introduction?
Or can describe how you made your tests?
Did you use trace-cmd in your tests?
Some
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Sat, 7 Feb 2015 09:01:34 +0100
Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
- Tested-by's
- Reference of 2/2 to 1/2
The two are together in the series and fix two different bugs. They do
not need to reference each
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 10:20:02AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Sat, 7 Feb 2015 09:01:34 +0100
Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
- Tested-by's
- Reference of 2/2 to 1/2
The two are together in the series and fix two different bugs. They do
not need to reference each other.
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Paul E. McKenney
paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 10:20:02AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Sat, 7 Feb 2015 09:01:34 +0100
Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
- Tested-by's
- Reference of 2/2 to 1/2
The two are together in
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Paul E. McKenney
paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 04:52:05PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Sat, 7 Feb 2015 12:09:48 -0800
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
The tag sequence has the meaning of:
git
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 04:52:05PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Sat, 7 Feb 2015 12:09:48 -0800
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
The tag sequence has the meaning of:
git cherry-pick a1f84a3
git cherry-pick 1b9508f
git cherry-pick fd21073
git
Feel free to add to the pair:
Acked-by: Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
On Sat, 7 Feb 2015 12:09:48 -0800
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
The tag sequence has the meaning of:
git cherry-pick a1f84a3
git cherry-pick 1b9508f
git cherry-pick fd21073
git cherry-pick this commit
Does that do what you need?
Note, for this
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:27:54 -0800
"Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
> > Reported-by: Sedat Dilek
> > Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney
> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt
>
> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney
Both patches survived all my tests, now I just need an ack by from Dave
and/or Peter, and I'll push
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 03:06:55PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
>
> When taking a CPU down for suspend and resume, a tracepoint may be called
> when the CPU has been designated offline. As tracepoints require RCU for
> protection, they must not be called if the
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 22:39:52 +0100
> Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
>> Man man man you write and test your stuff still on ancient x85 arch.
>> What's coming next... revive/reinclude i386 code?
>
> Real mode for Real men! Yeah Baby!
>
I hope you
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 22:39:52 +0100
Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Man man man you write and test your stuff still on ancient x85 arch.
> What's coming next... revive/reinclude i386 code?
Real mode for Real men! Yeah Baby!
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 21:11:57 +0100
> Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
>> >
>>
>> Subject: x86/tbl/trace: ---> .../tlb/...
>>
>
> But you missed that the
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 21:11:57 +0100
Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
> >
>
> Subject: x86/tbl/trace: ---> .../tlb/...
>
But you missed that the cover letter was for x85 ;-)
(I did too, it was pointed out to me on
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 21:23:13 +0100
Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 21:11:57 +0100
> > Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >> > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
> >> >
> >>
> >>
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 21:11:57 +0100
> Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
>> >
>>
>> Subject: x86/tbl/trace: ---> .../tlb/...
>>
>
> But I wanted "To Be Loved".
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 21:11:57 +0100
Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
> >
>
> Subject: x86/tbl/trace: ---> .../tlb/...
>
But I wanted "To Be Loved".
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
>
Subject: x86/tbl/trace: ---> .../tlb/...
- Sedat -
> When taking a CPU down for suspend and resume, a tracepoint may be called
> when the CPU has been designated offline. As tracepoints require RCU for
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
When taking a CPU down for suspend and resume, a tracepoint may be called
when the CPU has been designated offline. As tracepoints require RCU for
protection, they must not be called if the current CPU is offline.
Unfortunately, trace_tlb_flush() is called in
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 21:11:57 +0100
Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
From: Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) rost...@goodmis.org
Subject: x86/tbl/trace: --- .../tlb/...
But I wanted To Be Loved.
-- Steve
--
To
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
From: Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) rost...@goodmis.org
Subject: x86/tbl/trace: --- .../tlb/...
- Sedat -
When taking a CPU down for suspend and resume, a tracepoint may be called
when the CPU has been designated offline.
From: Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) rost...@goodmis.org
When taking a CPU down for suspend and resume, a tracepoint may be called
when the CPU has been designated offline. As tracepoints require RCU for
protection, they must not be called if the current CPU is offline.
Unfortunately,
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 21:23:13 +0100
Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 21:11:57 +0100
Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Steven Rostedt
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 21:11:57 +0100
Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
From: Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) rost...@goodmis.org
Subject:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 21:11:57 +0100
Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
From: Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) rost...@goodmis.org
Subject:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 22:39:52 +0100
Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
Man man man you write and test your stuff still on ancient x85 arch.
What's coming next... revive/reinclude i386 code?
Real mode for Real
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 03:06:55PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
From: Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) rost...@goodmis.org
When taking a CPU down for suspend and resume, a tracepoint may be called
when the CPU has been designated offline. As tracepoints require RCU for
protection, they must not be
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 21:11:57 +0100
Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
From: Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) rost...@goodmis.org
Subject: x86/tbl/trace: --- .../tlb/...
But you missed that the cover letter was for
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 22:39:52 +0100
Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote:
Man man man you write and test your stuff still on ancient x85 arch.
What's coming next... revive/reinclude i386 code?
Real mode for Real men! Yeah Baby!
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:27:54 -0800
Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Reported-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com
Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney
44 matches
Mail list logo
