On 04/10/2014 02:23 PM, David Cohen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 01:35:36PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:30:10PM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:15:23PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 01:59:04PM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 01:35:36PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:30:10PM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:15:23PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 01:59:04PM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
> > > > This patch adds platform code
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:30:10PM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:15:23PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 01:59:04PM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
> > > This patch adds platform code for Intel Merrifield.
> > > Since the watchdog is not part of SFI
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:15:23PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 01:59:04PM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
> > This patch adds platform code for Intel Merrifield.
> > Since the watchdog is not part of SFI table, we have no other option but
> > to manually register watchdog's
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 01:59:04PM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
> This patch adds platform code for Intel Merrifield.
> Since the watchdog is not part of SFI table, we have no other option but
> to manually register watchdog's platform device (argh!).
>
> Signed-off-by: David Cohen
> ---
Does it
> > We'll see if and what will be accepted upstream.
>
> As far as I can see, CONFIG_OF is only selected if a specific hardware is
> enabled.
For conventional PC it makes no sense. For non conventional devices -
well Kconfig is also convered by the GPL ;-)
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this
We'll see if and what will be accepted upstream.
As far as I can see, CONFIG_OF is only selected if a specific hardware is
enabled.
For conventional PC it makes no sense. For non conventional devices -
well Kconfig is also convered by the GPL ;-)
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 01:59:04PM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
This patch adds platform code for Intel Merrifield.
Since the watchdog is not part of SFI table, we have no other option but
to manually register watchdog's platform device (argh!).
Signed-off-by: David Cohen
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:15:23PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 01:59:04PM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
This patch adds platform code for Intel Merrifield.
Since the watchdog is not part of SFI table, we have no other option but
to manually register watchdog's platform
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:30:10PM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:15:23PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 01:59:04PM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
This patch adds platform code for Intel Merrifield.
Since the watchdog is not part of SFI table, we have
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 01:35:36PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:30:10PM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:15:23PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 01:59:04PM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
This patch adds platform code for Intel
On 04/10/2014 02:23 PM, David Cohen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 01:35:36PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:30:10PM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:15:23PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 01:59:04PM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 01:42:23PM +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Apr 2014 13:59:04 -0700
> David Cohen wrote:
>
> > This patch adds platform code for Intel Merrifield.
> > Since the watchdog is not part of SFI table, we have no other option but
> > to manually register
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 06:10:11PM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 April 2014 08:18:22, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 04:03:14PM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 09 April 2014 14:58:48, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> > > > > I'm getting curious: How
On Wednesday 09 April 2014 08:18:22, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 04:03:14PM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
> > On Wednesday 09 April 2014 14:58:48, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> > > > I'm getting curious: How can I use device-tree on x86(_64)?
> > > > Reading the dependencies from
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 04:03:14PM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 April 2014 14:58:48, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> > > I'm getting curious: How can I use device-tree on x86(_64)?
> > > Reading the dependencies from CONFIG_OF it can only be used on 32bit
> > > systems with some
On Wednesday 09 April 2014 14:58:48, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> > I'm getting curious: How can I use device-tree on x86(_64)?
> > Reading the dependencies from CONFIG_OF it can only be used on 32bit
> > systems with some special hardware bases.
> > So, how to use otherwise?
>
> There isn't any
> I'm getting curious: How can I use device-tree on x86(_64)?
> Reading the dependencies from CONFIG_OF it can only be used on 32bit systems
> with some special hardware bases.
> So, how to use otherwise?
There isn't any fundamental thing tying device tree to a given
architecture or 32bitness,
On Wednesday 09 April 2014 13:42:23, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Apr 2014 13:59:04 -0700
> David Cohen wrote:
>
> > This patch adds platform code for Intel Merrifield.
> > Since the watchdog is not part of SFI table, we have no other option but
> > to manually register watchdog's
On Tue, 8 Apr 2014 13:59:04 -0700
David Cohen wrote:
> This patch adds platform code for Intel Merrifield.
> Since the watchdog is not part of SFI table, we have no other option but
> to manually register watchdog's platform device (argh!).
Before going too far down that path have you
On Tue, 8 Apr 2014 13:59:04 -0700
David Cohen david.a.co...@linux.intel.com wrote:
This patch adds platform code for Intel Merrifield.
Since the watchdog is not part of SFI table, we have no other option but
to manually register watchdog's platform device (argh!).
Before going too far down
On Wednesday 09 April 2014 13:42:23, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
On Tue, 8 Apr 2014 13:59:04 -0700
David Cohen david.a.co...@linux.intel.com wrote:
This patch adds platform code for Intel Merrifield.
Since the watchdog is not part of SFI table, we have no other option but
to manually
I'm getting curious: How can I use device-tree on x86(_64)?
Reading the dependencies from CONFIG_OF it can only be used on 32bit systems
with some special hardware bases.
So, how to use otherwise?
There isn't any fundamental thing tying device tree to a given
architecture or 32bitness, it's
On Wednesday 09 April 2014 14:58:48, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
I'm getting curious: How can I use device-tree on x86(_64)?
Reading the dependencies from CONFIG_OF it can only be used on 32bit
systems with some special hardware bases.
So, how to use otherwise?
There isn't any
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 04:03:14PM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
On Wednesday 09 April 2014 14:58:48, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
I'm getting curious: How can I use device-tree on x86(_64)?
Reading the dependencies from CONFIG_OF it can only be used on 32bit
systems with some special
On Wednesday 09 April 2014 08:18:22, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 04:03:14PM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
On Wednesday 09 April 2014 14:58:48, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
I'm getting curious: How can I use device-tree on x86(_64)?
Reading the dependencies from CONFIG_OF
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 06:10:11PM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
On Wednesday 09 April 2014 08:18:22, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 04:03:14PM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
On Wednesday 09 April 2014 14:58:48, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
I'm getting curious: How can I use
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 01:42:23PM +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
On Tue, 8 Apr 2014 13:59:04 -0700
David Cohen david.a.co...@linux.intel.com wrote:
This patch adds platform code for Intel Merrifield.
Since the watchdog is not part of SFI table, we have no other option but
to
This patch adds platform code for Intel Merrifield.
Since the watchdog is not part of SFI table, we have no other option but
to manually register watchdog's platform device (argh!).
Signed-off-by: David Cohen
---
arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/Makefile | 1 +
This patch adds platform code for Intel Merrifield.
Since the watchdog is not part of SFI table, we have no other option but
to manually register watchdog's platform device (argh!).
Signed-off-by: David Cohen david.a.co...@linux.intel.com
---
arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/Makefile |
30 matches
Mail list logo
