On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 01:03:09AM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> Marvell Dove's pinctrl does require some PMU regs for muxing PMU
> functions to MPP pins. Recently, a discussion started about consolidating
> Power Management Unit (PMU) into a single DT node. As we don't want
> anymore DT
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 01:03:09AM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
Marvell Dove's pinctrl does require some PMU regs for muxing PMU
functions to MPP pins. Recently, a discussion started about consolidating
Power Management Unit (PMU) into a single DT node. As we don't want
anymore DT ABI
Marvell Dove's pinctrl does require some PMU regs for muxing PMU
functions to MPP pins. Recently, a discussion started about consolidating
Power Management Unit (PMU) into a single DT node. As we don't want
anymore DT ABI in the way, drop the corresponding reg property from
pinctrl binding
Marvell Dove's pinctrl does require some PMU regs for muxing PMU
functions to MPP pins. Recently, a discussion started about consolidating
Power Management Unit (PMU) into a single DT node. As we don't want
anymore DT ABI in the way, drop the corresponding reg property from
pinctrl binding
4 matches
Mail list logo