Place drm_event_vblank in a new union that includes that and a bare
drm_event structure. This will allow new members of that union to be
added in the future without changing code related to the existing vbl
event type.
Assignments to the crtc_id field are now done when the event is
allocated,
Place drm_event_vblank in a new union that includes that and a bare
drm_event structure. This will allow new members of that union to be
added in the future without changing code related to the existing vbl
event type.
Assignments to the crtc_id field are now done when the event is
allocated,
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 05:45:13PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> Place drm_event_vblank in a new union that includes that and a bare
> drm_event structure. This will allow new members of that union to be
> added in the future without changing code related to the existing vbl
> event type.
>
>
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 05:45:13PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> Place drm_event_vblank in a new union that includes that and a bare
> drm_event structure. This will allow new members of that union to be
> added in the future without changing code related to the existing vbl
> event type.
>
>
Place drm_event_vblank in a new union that includes that and a bare
drm_event structure. This will allow new members of that union to be
added in the future without changing code related to the existing vbl
event type.
Assignments to the crtc_id field are now done when the event is
allocated,
Place drm_event_vblank in a new union that includes that and a bare
drm_event structure. This will allow new members of that union to be
added in the future without changing code related to the existing vbl
event type.
Assignments to the crtc_id field are now done when the event is
allocated,
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:03:05PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> Place drm_event_vblank in a new union that includes that and a bare
> drm_event structure. This will allow new members of that union to be
> added in the future without changing code related to the existing vbl
> event type.
>
>
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:03:05PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> Place drm_event_vblank in a new union that includes that and a bare
> drm_event structure. This will allow new members of that union to be
> added in the future without changing code related to the existing vbl
> event type.
>
>
Place drm_event_vblank in a new union that includes that and a bare
drm_event structure. This will allow new members of that union to be
added in the future without changing code related to the existing vbl
event type.
Assignments to the crtc_id field are now done when the event is
allocated,
Place drm_event_vblank in a new union that includes that and a bare
drm_event structure. This will allow new members of that union to be
added in the future without changing code related to the existing vbl
event type.
Assignments to the crtc_id field are now done when the event is
allocated,
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 08:36:00AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> Daniel Vetter writes:
>
> > A few nits below, but looks good otherwise.
>
> Thanks.
>
> >> static struct drm_pending_vblank_event *create_vblank_event(
> >> - struct drm_device *dev, uint64_t user_data)
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 08:36:00AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> Daniel Vetter writes:
>
> > A few nits below, but looks good otherwise.
>
> Thanks.
>
> >> static struct drm_pending_vblank_event *create_vblank_event(
> >> - struct drm_device *dev, uint64_t user_data)
> >> +
Daniel Vetter writes:
> A few nits below, but looks good otherwise.
Thanks.
>> static struct drm_pending_vblank_event *create_vblank_event(
>> -struct drm_device *dev, uint64_t user_data)
>> +struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_crtc *crtc, uint64_t
>>
Daniel Vetter writes:
> A few nits below, but looks good otherwise.
Thanks.
>> static struct drm_pending_vblank_event *create_vblank_event(
>> -struct drm_device *dev, uint64_t user_data)
>> +struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_crtc *crtc, uint64_t
>> user_data)
>
>
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 03:10:12PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> Place drm_event_vblank in a new union that includes that and a bare
> drm_event structure. This will allow new members of that union to be
> added in the future without changing code related to the existing vbl
> event type.
>
>
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 03:10:12PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> Place drm_event_vblank in a new union that includes that and a bare
> drm_event structure. This will allow new members of that union to be
> added in the future without changing code related to the existing vbl
> event type.
>
>
Place drm_event_vblank in a new union that includes that and a bare
drm_event structure. This will allow new members of that union to be
added in the future without changing code related to the existing vbl
event type.
Assignments to the crtc_id field are now done when the event is
allocated,
Place drm_event_vblank in a new union that includes that and a bare
drm_event structure. This will allow new members of that union to be
added in the future without changing code related to the existing vbl
event type.
Assignments to the crtc_id field are now done when the event is
allocated,
18 matches
Mail list logo