On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:39:24PM +0530, Girish K S wrote:
>> From: Girish K S
>>
>> The existing driver supports gpio based /cs signal.
>> For controller's that have one device per controller,
>> the slave device's /cs signal might be
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:39:24PM +0530, Girish K S wrote:
From: Girish K S girishks2...@gmail.com
The existing driver supports gpio based /cs signal.
For controller's that have one device per controller,
the slave
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:39:24PM +0530, Girish K S wrote:
> From: Girish K S
>
> The existing driver supports gpio based /cs signal.
> For controller's that have one device per controller,
> the slave device's /cs signal might be internally controlled
> by the chip select bit of slave select
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:39:24PM +0530, Girish K S wrote:
From: Girish K S girishks2...@gmail.com
The existing driver supports gpio based /cs signal.
For controller's that have one device per controller,
the slave device's /cs signal might be internally controlled
by the chip select bit
From: Girish K S
The existing driver supports gpio based /cs signal.
For controller's that have one device per controller,
the slave device's /cs signal might be internally controlled
by the chip select bit of slave select register. They are not
externally asserted/deasserted using gpio pin.
From: Girish K S girishks2...@gmail.com
The existing driver supports gpio based /cs signal.
For controller's that have one device per controller,
the slave device's /cs signal might be internally controlled
by the chip select bit of slave select register. They are not
externally
6 matches
Mail list logo
