On 17/07/2015 02:35, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
>> Right now, NPT page attributes are not used, and the final page
>> attribute depends solely on gPAT (which however is not synced
>> correctly), the guest MTRRs and the guest page attributes.
>>
>> However, we can do better by mimicking what is
On 07/07/2015 06:45 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Right now, NPT page attributes are not used, and the final page
attribute depends solely on gPAT (which however is not synced
correctly), the guest MTRRs and the guest page attributes.
However, we can do better by mimicking what is done for VMX.
In
On 17/07/2015 02:35, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
Right now, NPT page attributes are not used, and the final page
attribute depends solely on gPAT (which however is not synced
correctly), the guest MTRRs and the guest page attributes.
However, we can do better by mimicking what is done for VMX.
On 07/07/2015 06:45 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Right now, NPT page attributes are not used, and the final page
attribute depends solely on gPAT (which however is not synced
correctly), the guest MTRRs and the guest page attributes.
However, we can do better by mimicking what is done for VMX.
In
On 07/10/2015 06:47 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 10/07/2015 03:19, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
yes, this is correct. QEMU still does not have support for disabling
"quirks", so gCR0.CD is currently hidden on SVM. I would like to
include this series in 4.2, while for 4.3 I will disable the quirk
On 10/07/2015 03:19, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> yes, this is correct. QEMU still does not have support for disabling
>> "quirks", so gCR0.CD is currently hidden on SVM. I would like to
>> include this series in 4.2, while for 4.3 I will disable the quirk above
>> altogether (it is superseded by
On 10/07/2015 03:19, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
yes, this is correct. QEMU still does not have support for disabling
quirks, so gCR0.CD is currently hidden on SVM. I would like to
include this series in 4.2, while for 4.3 I will disable the quirk above
altogether (it is superseded by the way
On 07/10/2015 06:47 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 10/07/2015 03:19, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
yes, this is correct. QEMU still does not have support for disabling
quirks, so gCR0.CD is currently hidden on SVM. I would like to
include this series in 4.2, while for 4.3 I will disable the quirk
On 07/09/2015 11:18 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 09/07/2015 04:30, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index 602b974a60a6..0f125c1860ec 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -1085,6 +1085,47 @@ static u64
On 09/07/2015 04:30, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index 602b974a60a6..0f125c1860ec 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -1085,6 +1085,47 @@ static u64 svm_compute_tsc_offset(struct
kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
On 09/07/2015 04:30, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index 602b974a60a6..0f125c1860ec 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -1085,6 +1085,47 @@ static u64 svm_compute_tsc_offset(struct
kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 target_tsc)
On 07/09/2015 11:18 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 09/07/2015 04:30, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index 602b974a60a6..0f125c1860ec 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -1085,6 +1085,47 @@ static u64
On 07/08/2015 07:19 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 08/07/2015 07:59, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
On 07/07/2015 09:45 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Right now, NPT page attributes are not used, and the final page
attribute depends solely on gPAT (which however is not synced
correctly), the guest MTRRs
Right now, NPT page attributes are not used, and the final page
attribute depends solely on gPAT (which however is not synced
correctly), the guest MTRRs and the guest page attributes.
However, we can do better by mimicking what is done for VMX.
In the absence of PCI passthrough, the guest PAT
On 08/07/2015 07:59, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>
>
> On 07/07/2015 09:45 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Right now, NPT page attributes are not used, and the final page
>> attribute depends solely on gPAT (which however is not synced
>> correctly), the guest MTRRs and the guest page attributes.
>>
>>
On 07/07/2015 09:45 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Right now, NPT page attributes are not used, and the final page
attribute depends solely on gPAT (which however is not synced
correctly), the guest MTRRs and the guest page attributes.
However, we can do better by mimicking what is done for VMX.
In
On 08/07/2015 07:59, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
On 07/07/2015 09:45 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Right now, NPT page attributes are not used, and the final page
attribute depends solely on gPAT (which however is not synced
correctly), the guest MTRRs and the guest page attributes.
However, we
Right now, NPT page attributes are not used, and the final page
attribute depends solely on gPAT (which however is not synced
correctly), the guest MTRRs and the guest page attributes.
However, we can do better by mimicking what is done for VMX.
In the absence of PCI passthrough, the guest PAT
On 07/07/2015 09:45 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Right now, NPT page attributes are not used, and the final page
attribute depends solely on gPAT (which however is not synced
correctly), the guest MTRRs and the guest page attributes.
However, we can do better by mimicking what is done for VMX.
In
On 07/08/2015 07:19 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 08/07/2015 07:59, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
On 07/07/2015 09:45 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Right now, NPT page attributes are not used, and the final page
attribute depends solely on gPAT (which however is not synced
correctly), the guest MTRRs
Right now, NPT page attributes are not used, and the final page
attribute depends solely on gPAT (which however is not synced
correctly), the guest MTRRs and the guest page attributes.
However, we can do better by mimicking what is done for VMX.
In the absence of PCI passthrough, the guest PAT
Right now, NPT page attributes are not used, and the final page
attribute depends solely on gPAT (which however is not synced
correctly), the guest MTRRs and the guest page attributes.
However, we can do better by mimicking what is done for VMX.
In the absence of PCI passthrough, the guest PAT
22 matches
Mail list logo
