On Mon 05-05-14 13:47:42, John Stultz wrote:
> After learning we'll need some sort of deferred printk functionality
> in the timekeeping core, Peter suggested we rename the printk_sched
> function so it can be reused by needed subsystems.
>
> This only changes the function name. No logic changes.
On Mon 05-05-14 13:47:42, John Stultz wrote:
After learning we'll need some sort of deferred printk functionality
in the timekeeping core, Peter suggested we rename the printk_sched
function so it can be reused by needed subsystems.
This only changes the function name. No logic changes.
After learning we'll need some sort of deferred printk functionality
in the timekeeping core, Peter suggested we rename the printk_sched
function so it can be reused by needed subsystems.
This only changes the function name. No logic changes.
Cc: Jan Kara
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Jiri Bohac
Cc:
After learning we'll need some sort of deferred printk functionality
in the timekeeping core, Peter suggested we rename the printk_sched
function so it can be reused by needed subsystems.
This only changes the function name. No logic changes.
Cc: Jan Kara j...@suse.cz
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
After learning we'll need some sort of deferred printk functionality
in the timekeeping core, Peter suggested we rename the printk_sched
function so it can be reused by needed subsystems.
This only changes the function name and name of the associated buffer.
No logic changes.
Cc: Jan Kara
Cc:
After learning we'll need some sort of deferred printk functionality
in the timekeeping core, Peter suggested we rename the printk_sched
function so it can be reused by needed subsystems.
This only changes the function name and name of the associated buffer.
No logic changes.
Cc: Jan Kara
6 matches
Mail list logo
