On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 05:07:03PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 01:00:34 +0100
> Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Not really - some of this code can be built as modules, so it's mostly
> > module_init rather than anything from the initcall family.
> >
>
> hm. So the ACPI code
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 01:00:34 +0100
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 04:45:38PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > Relying upon link ordering is the old-fashioned way of doing things,
> > and I have vague memories that it only works by luck - that there's no
> > hard-and-fast rule
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 04:45:38PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Relying upon link ordering is the old-fashioned way of doing things,
> and I have vague memories that it only works by luck - that there's no
> hard-and-fast rule that the linker has to obey what we think we asked
> it to do.
>
>
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:53:37 -0500
miny...@acm.org wrote:
> From: Matthew Garrett
>
> Drivers may make calls that require the ACPI IPMI driver to have been
> initialised already, so make sure that it appears earlier in the build
> order.
>
> ...
>
> index 47199e2..82422fe 100644
> ---
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:53:37 -0500
miny...@acm.org wrote:
From: Matthew Garrett m...@redhat.com
Drivers may make calls that require the ACPI IPMI driver to have been
initialised already, so make sure that it appears earlier in the build
order.
...
index 47199e2..82422fe 100644
---
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 04:45:38PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Relying upon link ordering is the old-fashioned way of doing things,
and I have vague memories that it only works by luck - that there's no
hard-and-fast rule that the linker has to obey what we think we asked
it to do.
The
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 01:00:34 +0100
Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 04:45:38PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Relying upon link ordering is the old-fashioned way of doing things,
and I have vague memories that it only works by luck - that there's no
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 05:07:03PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 01:00:34 +0100
Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
Not really - some of this code can be built as modules, so it's mostly
module_init rather than anything from the initcall family.
hm. So the
From: Matthew Garrett
Drivers may make calls that require the ACPI IPMI driver to have been
initialised already, so make sure that it appears earlier in the build
order.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard
---
drivers/acpi/Makefile |5 -
1 files changed, 4
From: Matthew Garrett m...@redhat.com
Drivers may make calls that require the ACPI IPMI driver to have been
initialised already, so make sure that it appears earlier in the build
order.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett m...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard cminy...@mvista.com
---
10 matches
Mail list logo
