Re: [PATCH 2/5] cpufreq: don't break string in print statements

2013-09-12 Thread Srivatsa S. Bhat
On 09/12/2013 10:55 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > As a rule its better not to break string (quoted inside "") in a print > statement > even if it crosses 80 column boundary as that may introduce unwanted bugs and > so > this patch rewrites one of the print statements.. > Ok, if that is the

Re: [PATCH 2/5] cpufreq: don't break string in print statements

2013-09-12 Thread Srivatsa S. Bhat
On 09/12/2013 10:55 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: As a rule its better not to break string (quoted inside ) in a print statement even if it crosses 80 column boundary as that may introduce unwanted bugs and so this patch rewrites one of the print statements.. Ok, if that is the convention,

[PATCH 2/5] cpufreq: don't break string in print statements

2013-09-11 Thread Viresh Kumar
As a rule its better not to break string (quoted inside "") in a print statement even if it crosses 80 column boundary as that may introduce unwanted bugs and so this patch rewrites one of the print statements.. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed,

[PATCH 2/5] cpufreq: don't break string in print statements

2013-09-11 Thread Viresh Kumar
As a rule its better not to break string (quoted inside ) in a print statement even if it crosses 80 column boundary as that may introduce unwanted bugs and so this patch rewrites one of the print statements.. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 4