>
> Hi Li,
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Li Fei wrote:
> > Even in failed case of pm_runtime_get_sync, the usage_count
> > is incremented. In order to keep the usage_count with correct
> > value and runtime power management to behave correctly, call
> > pm_runtime_put(_sync) in such
Hi Li,
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Li Fei wrote:
> Even in failed case of pm_runtime_get_sync, the usage_count
> is incremented. In order to keep the usage_count with correct
> value and runtime power management to behave correctly, call
> pm_runtime_put(_sync) in such case.
As with the
Hi Li,
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Li Fei fei...@intel.com wrote:
Even in failed case of pm_runtime_get_sync, the usage_count
is incremented. In order to keep the usage_count with correct
value and runtime power management to behave correctly, call
pm_runtime_put(_sync) in such case.
As
Hi Li,
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Li Fei fei...@intel.com wrote:
Even in failed case of pm_runtime_get_sync, the usage_count
is incremented. In order to keep the usage_count with correct
value and runtime power management to behave correctly, call
pm_runtime_put(_sync) in such
Even in failed case of pm_runtime_get_sync, the usage_count
is incremented. In order to keep the usage_count with correct
value and runtime power management to behave correctly, call
pm_runtime_put(_sync) in such case.
Signed-off-by Liu Chuansheng
Signed-off-by: Li Fei
---
Even in failed case of pm_runtime_get_sync, the usage_count
is incremented. In order to keep the usage_count with correct
value and runtime power management to behave correctly, call
pm_runtime_put(_sync) in such case.
Signed-off-by Liu Chuansheng chuansheng@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Li Fei
6 matches
Mail list logo