On Friday 07/03 at 08:38 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >
> > +struct _sas_device *
> > +mpt2sas_scsih_sas_device_get_by_sas_address_nolock(struct MPT2SAS_ADAPTER
> > *ioc,
> > +u64 sas_address)
>
> Any chance to use a shorter name for this function? E.g.
> __mpt2sas_get_sdev_by_addr ?
On Friday 07/03 at 08:38 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
+struct _sas_device *
+mpt2sas_scsih_sas_device_get_by_sas_address_nolock(struct MPT2SAS_ADAPTER
*ioc,
+u64 sas_address)
Any chance to use a shorter name for this function? E.g.
__mpt2sas_get_sdev_by_addr ?
Will do.
>
> +struct _sas_device *
> +mpt2sas_scsih_sas_device_get_by_sas_address_nolock(struct MPT2SAS_ADAPTER
> *ioc,
> +u64 sas_address)
Any chance to use a shorter name for this function? E.g.
__mpt2sas_get_sdev_by_addr ?
> +{
> + struct _sas_device *sas_device;
> +
> +
+struct _sas_device *
+mpt2sas_scsih_sas_device_get_by_sas_address_nolock(struct MPT2SAS_ADAPTER
*ioc,
+u64 sas_address)
Any chance to use a shorter name for this function? E.g.
__mpt2sas_get_sdev_by_addr ?
+{
+ struct _sas_device *sas_device;
+
+
This patch refactors the code in the driver to use the new reference
count on the sas_device struct.
Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens
---
drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_base.h | 4 +-
drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_scsih.c | 329 ---
This patch refactors the code in the driver to use the new reference
count on the sas_device struct.
Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens calvinow...@fb.com
---
drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_base.h | 4 +-
drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_scsih.c | 329 ---
This patch refactors the code in the driver to use the new reference
count on the sas_device struct.
Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens
---
drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_base.h | 4 +-
drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_scsih.c | 329 ---
This patch refactors the code in the driver to use the new reference
count on the sas_device struct.
Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens calvinow...@fb.com
---
drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_base.h | 4 +-
drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_scsih.c | 329 ---
8 matches
Mail list logo