Re: [PATCH 2/6] i2c: i2c_del_adapter: Don't treat removing a non-registered adapter as error

2013-03-30 Thread Jean Delvare
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 19:16:45 +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > Currently i2c_del_adapter() returns -EINVAL when it gets an adapter which is > not > registered. But none of the users of i2c_del_adapter() depend on this > behavior, At least two used to depend on it actually, and this is even why

Re: [PATCH 2/6] i2c: i2c_del_adapter: Don't treat removing a non-registered adapter as error

2013-03-30 Thread Jean Delvare
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 19:16:45 +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: Currently i2c_del_adapter() returns -EINVAL when it gets an adapter which is not registered. But none of the users of i2c_del_adapter() depend on this behavior, At least two used to depend on it actually, and this is even why

[PATCH 2/6] i2c: i2c_del_adapter: Don't treat removing a non-registered adapter as error

2013-03-09 Thread Lars-Peter Clausen
Currently i2c_del_adapter() returns -EINVAL when it gets an adapter which is not registered. But none of the users of i2c_del_adapter() depend on this behavior, so for the sake of being able to sanitize the return type of i2c_del_adapter argue, that the purpose of i2c_del_adapter() is to remove an

[PATCH 2/6] i2c: i2c_del_adapter: Don't treat removing a non-registered adapter as error

2013-03-09 Thread Lars-Peter Clausen
Currently i2c_del_adapter() returns -EINVAL when it gets an adapter which is not registered. But none of the users of i2c_del_adapter() depend on this behavior, so for the sake of being able to sanitize the return type of i2c_del_adapter argue, that the purpose of i2c_del_adapter() is to remove an