On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 19:16:45 +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> Currently i2c_del_adapter() returns -EINVAL when it gets an adapter which is
> not
> registered. But none of the users of i2c_del_adapter() depend on this
> behavior,
At least two used to depend on it actually, and this is even why
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 19:16:45 +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
Currently i2c_del_adapter() returns -EINVAL when it gets an adapter which is
not
registered. But none of the users of i2c_del_adapter() depend on this
behavior,
At least two used to depend on it actually, and this is even why
Currently i2c_del_adapter() returns -EINVAL when it gets an adapter which is not
registered. But none of the users of i2c_del_adapter() depend on this behavior,
so for the sake of being able to sanitize the return type of i2c_del_adapter
argue, that the purpose of i2c_del_adapter() is to remove an
Currently i2c_del_adapter() returns -EINVAL when it gets an adapter which is not
registered. But none of the users of i2c_del_adapter() depend on this behavior,
so for the sake of being able to sanitize the return type of i2c_del_adapter
argue, that the purpose of i2c_del_adapter() is to remove an
4 matches
Mail list logo