Thanks!
11.01.2013 21:20, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:03:12PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 06:56:58PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
11.12.2012 19:35, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:20:36AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On
11.01.2013 21:03, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 06:56:58PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
11.12.2012 19:35, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:20:36AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 07:07:00PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
I don'
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:03:12PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 06:56:58PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> > 11.12.2012 19:35, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
> > >On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:20:36AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > >>On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 07:07:00PM +0400,
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 06:56:58PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> 11.12.2012 19:35, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
> >On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:20:36AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> >>On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 07:07:00PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> >>>I don't really understand, how mountd'
11.12.2012 19:35, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:20:36AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 07:07:00PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
I don't really understand, how mountd's root can be wrong. I.e.
its' always right as I see it. NFSd kthreads have to s
11.12.2012 19:35, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:20:36AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 07:07:00PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
I don't really understand, how mountd's root can be wrong. I.e.
its' always right as I see it. NFSd kthreads have to s
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:20:36AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 07:07:00PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> > I don't really understand, how mountd's root can be wrong. I.e.
> > its' always right as I see it. NFSd kthreads have to swap/use
> > relative path/whatever
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 07:07:00PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> 11.12.2012 18:56, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
> >On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 06:12:40PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> >>UID: 9899
> >>
> >>11.12.2012 18:00, Stanislav Kinsbursky пишет:
> >>>11.12.2012 00:28, J. Bruce Fields пишет
11.12.2012 18:56, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 06:12:40PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
UID: 9899
11.12.2012 18:00, Stanislav Kinsbursky пишет:
11.12.2012 00:28, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 06:34:47PM +0300, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
NFSd does look
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 09:56:21AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> That looks simpler, but I still don't understand why we need it.
>
> I'm confused about how d_path works; I would have thought that
> filesystem namespaces would have their own vfsmount trees and hence that
> the (vfsmount, dentry
11.12.2012 18:54, Al Viro пишет:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 06:00:00PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
11.12.2012 00:28, J. Bruce Fields ??:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 06:34:47PM +0300, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
NFSd does lookup. Lookup is done starting from current->fs->root.
NFSd is a
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 06:12:40PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> UID: 9899
>
> 11.12.2012 18:00, Stanislav Kinsbursky пишет:
> >11.12.2012 00:28, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
> >>On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 06:34:47PM +0300, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> >>>NFSd does lookup. Lookup is done starting f
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 06:00:00PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> 11.12.2012 00:28, J. Bruce Fields ??:
> >On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 06:34:47PM +0300, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> >>NFSd does lookup. Lookup is done starting from current->fs->root.
> >>NFSd is a kthread, cloned by kthre
11.12.2012 18:12, Stanislav Kinsbursky пишет:
11.12.2012 18:00, Stanislav Kinsbursky пишет:
11.12.2012 00:28, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 06:34:47PM +0300, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
NFSd does lookup. Lookup is done starting from current->fs->root.
NFSd is a kthread, cloned
11.12.2012 18:00, Stanislav Kinsbursky пишет:
11.12.2012 00:28, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 06:34:47PM +0300, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
NFSd does lookup. Lookup is done starting from current->fs->root.
NFSd is a kthread, cloned by kthreadd, and thus have global (but luckely
11.12.2012 00:28, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 06:34:47PM +0300, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
NFSd does lookup. Lookup is done starting from current->fs->root.
NFSd is a kthread, cloned by kthreadd, and thus have global (but luckely
unshared) root.
So we have to swap root to tho
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 06:34:47PM +0300, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> NFSd does lookup. Lookup is done starting from current->fs->root.
> NFSd is a kthread, cloned by kthreadd, and thus have global (but luckely
> unshared) root.
> So we have to swap root to those, which process, started NFSd, has
NFSd does lookup. Lookup is done starting from current->fs->root.
NFSd is a kthread, cloned by kthreadd, and thus have global (but luckely
unshared) root.
So we have to swap root to those, which process, started NFSd, has. Because
that process can be in a container with it's own root.
Signed-off-b
18 matches
Mail list logo
