[PATCH 2/7] cpufreq: dt: dev_pm_opp_put_regulators() accepts NULL argument

[Viresh Kumar]

The dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs now accepts a NULL opp_table pointer and so
there is no need for us to carry the extra checks. Drop them.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
index 66b3db5efb53..5c049428a6f5 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
@@ -291,8 +291,7 @@ static int dt_cpufreq_early_init(struct device *dev, int 
cpu)
 out:
        if (priv->have_static_opps)
                dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table(priv->cpus);
-       if (priv->opp_table)
-               dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(priv->opp_table);
+       dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(priv->opp_table);
        free_cpumask_var(priv->cpus);
        return ret;
 }
@@ -305,8 +304,7 @@ static void dt_cpufreq_release(void)
                dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table(priv->cpu_dev, &priv->freq_table);
                if (priv->have_static_opps)
                        dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table(priv->cpus);
-               if (priv->opp_table)
-                       dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(priv->opp_table);
+               dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(priv->opp_table);
                free_cpumask_var(priv->cpus);
                list_del(&priv->node);
        }
-- 
2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af