On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 02:52:47PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> With fixed triggered by Vlastimil it should be like this.
> ---
> From b3a1480b54bf10924a9cd09c6d8b274fc81ca4ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michal Hocko
> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 13:18:20 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH]
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 02:52:47PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> With fixed triggered by Vlastimil it should be like this.
> ---
> From b3a1480b54bf10924a9cd09c6d8b274fc81ca4ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michal Hocko
> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 13:18:20 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] mm, vmscan: add
With fixed triggered by Vlastimil it should be like this.
---
>From b3a1480b54bf10924a9cd09c6d8b274fc81ca4ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Hocko
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 13:18:20 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] mm, vmscan: add active list aging tracepoint
Our reclaim process has
With fixed triggered by Vlastimil it should be like this.
---
>From b3a1480b54bf10924a9cd09c6d8b274fc81ca4ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Hocko
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 13:18:20 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] mm, vmscan: add active list aging tracepoint
Our reclaim process has several tracepoints
On 01/04/2017 02:16 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 04-01-17 13:52:24, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> On 01/04/2017 11:19 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> From: Michal Hocko
>>>
>>> Our reclaim process has several tracepoints to tell us more about how
>>> things are progressing. We are,
On 01/04/2017 02:16 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 04-01-17 13:52:24, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> On 01/04/2017 11:19 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> From: Michal Hocko
>>>
>>> Our reclaim process has several tracepoints to tell us more about how
>>> things are progressing. We are, however, missing a
On Wed 04-01-17 13:52:24, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 01/04/2017 11:19 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > From: Michal Hocko
> >
> > Our reclaim process has several tracepoints to tell us more about how
> > things are progressing. We are, however, missing a tracepoint to track
> >
On Wed 04-01-17 13:52:24, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 01/04/2017 11:19 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > From: Michal Hocko
> >
> > Our reclaim process has several tracepoints to tell us more about how
> > things are progressing. We are, however, missing a tracepoint to track
> > active list aging.
On 01/04/2017 11:19 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko
>
> Our reclaim process has several tracepoints to tell us more about how
> things are progressing. We are, however, missing a tracepoint to track
> active list aging. Introduce mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active which
On 01/04/2017 11:19 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko
>
> Our reclaim process has several tracepoints to tell us more about how
> things are progressing. We are, however, missing a tracepoint to track
> active list aging. Introduce mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active which reports
> the
From: Michal Hocko
Our reclaim process has several tracepoints to tell us more about how
things are progressing. We are, however, missing a tracepoint to track
active list aging. Introduce mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active which reports
the number of
- nr_scanned, nr_taken
From: Michal Hocko
Our reclaim process has several tracepoints to tell us more about how
things are progressing. We are, however, missing a tracepoint to track
active list aging. Introduce mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active which reports
the number of
- nr_scanned, nr_taken pages to tell us the
On Wed 04-01-17 14:07:22, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 09:21:22AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > with other tracepoints but that can be helpful because you do not have
> > all the tracepoints enabled all the time. So unless you see this
> > particular thing as a road block I
On Wed 04-01-17 14:07:22, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 09:21:22AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > with other tracepoints but that can be helpful because you do not have
> > all the tracepoints enabled all the time. So unless you see this
> > particular thing as a road block I
On 01/04/2017 06:07 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> With this,
> ./scripts/bloat-o-meter vmlinux.old vmlinux.new.new
> add/remove: 1/1 grow/shrink: 0/9 up/down: 1394/-1636 (-242)
> function old new delta
> isolate_lru_pages -1394
On 01/04/2017 06:07 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> With this,
> ./scripts/bloat-o-meter vmlinux.old vmlinux.new.new
> add/remove: 1/1 grow/shrink: 0/9 up/down: 1394/-1636 (-242)
> function old new delta
> isolate_lru_pages -1394
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 09:21:22AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 03-01-17 14:03:28, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Hi Michal,
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 05:37:42PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Sat 31-12-16 01:04:56, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > > From
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 09:21:22AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 03-01-17 14:03:28, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Hi Michal,
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 05:37:42PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Sat 31-12-16 01:04:56, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > > From
On Tue 03-01-17 14:03:28, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 05:37:42PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Sat 31-12-16 01:04:56, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > From 5f1bc22ad1e54050b4da3228d68945e70342ebb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > > From: Michal Hocko
On Tue 03-01-17 14:03:28, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 05:37:42PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Sat 31-12-16 01:04:56, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > From 5f1bc22ad1e54050b4da3228d68945e70342ebb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > > From: Michal Hocko
> > > >
Hi Michal,
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 05:37:42PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sat 31-12-16 01:04:56, Minchan Kim wrote:
> [...]
> > > From 5f1bc22ad1e54050b4da3228d68945e70342ebb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Michal Hocko
> > > Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 13:18:20 +0100
> > >
Hi Michal,
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 05:37:42PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sat 31-12-16 01:04:56, Minchan Kim wrote:
> [...]
> > > From 5f1bc22ad1e54050b4da3228d68945e70342ebb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Michal Hocko
> > > Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 13:18:20 +0100
> > > Subject: [PATCH]
On Fri 30-12-16 17:37:42, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sat 31-12-16 01:04:56, Minchan Kim wrote:
[...]
> > > - nr_rotated pages which tells us that we are hitting referenced
> > > pages which are deactivated. If this is a large part of the
> > > reported nr_deactivated pages then the active
On Fri 30-12-16 17:37:42, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sat 31-12-16 01:04:56, Minchan Kim wrote:
[...]
> > > - nr_rotated pages which tells us that we are hitting referenced
> > > pages which are deactivated. If this is a large part of the
> > > reported nr_deactivated pages then the active
On Sat 31-12-16 01:04:56, Minchan Kim wrote:
[...]
> > From 5f1bc22ad1e54050b4da3228d68945e70342ebb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Michal Hocko
> > Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 13:18:20 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] mm, vmscan: add active list aging tracepoint
> >
> > Our reclaim
On Sat 31-12-16 01:04:56, Minchan Kim wrote:
[...]
> > From 5f1bc22ad1e54050b4da3228d68945e70342ebb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Michal Hocko
> > Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 13:18:20 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] mm, vmscan: add active list aging tracepoint
> >
> > Our reclaim process has several
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 10:26:37AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 30-12-16 10:48:53, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 08:52:46AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Thu 29-12-16 14:33:59, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 04:30:27PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 10:26:37AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 30-12-16 10:48:53, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 08:52:46AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Thu 29-12-16 14:33:59, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 04:30:27PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
On Friday, December 30, 2016 5:27 PM Michal Hocko wrote:
> Anyway, what do you think about this updated patch? I have kept Hillf's
> A-b so please let me know if it is no longer valid.
>
My mind is not changed:)
Happy new year folks!
Hillf
On Friday, December 30, 2016 5:27 PM Michal Hocko wrote:
> Anyway, what do you think about this updated patch? I have kept Hillf's
> A-b so please let me know if it is no longer valid.
>
My mind is not changed:)
Happy new year folks!
Hillf
On Fri 30-12-16 10:48:53, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 08:52:46AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 29-12-16 14:33:59, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 04:30:27PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > > > +TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active,
> > > > +
> > >
On Fri 30-12-16 10:48:53, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 08:52:46AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 29-12-16 14:33:59, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 04:30:27PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > > > +TRACE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active,
> > > > +
> > >
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 08:52:46AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 29-12-16 14:33:59, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 04:30:27PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > From: Michal Hocko
> > >
> > > Our reclaim process has several tracepoints to tell us more about
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 08:52:46AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 29-12-16 14:33:59, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 04:30:27PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > From: Michal Hocko
> > >
> > > Our reclaim process has several tracepoints to tell us more about how
> > > things
On Thu 29-12-16 14:33:59, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 04:30:27PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > From: Michal Hocko
> >
> > Our reclaim process has several tracepoints to tell us more about how
> > things are progressing. We are, however, missing a tracepoint to
On Thu 29-12-16 14:33:59, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 04:30:27PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > From: Michal Hocko
> >
> > Our reclaim process has several tracepoints to tell us more about how
> > things are progressing. We are, however, missing a tracepoint to track
> > active
On Wednesday, December 28, 2016 11:30 PM Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko
>
> Our reclaim process has several tracepoints to tell us more about how
> things are progressing. We are, however, missing a tracepoint to track
> active list aging. Introduce
On Wednesday, December 28, 2016 11:30 PM Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko
>
> Our reclaim process has several tracepoints to tell us more about how
> things are progressing. We are, however, missing a tracepoint to track
> active list aging. Introduce mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active which
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 04:30:27PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko
>
> Our reclaim process has several tracepoints to tell us more about how
> things are progressing. We are, however, missing a tracepoint to track
> active list aging. Introduce
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 04:30:27PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko
>
> Our reclaim process has several tracepoints to tell us more about how
> things are progressing. We are, however, missing a tracepoint to track
> active list aging. Introduce mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active which
From: Michal Hocko
Our reclaim process has several tracepoints to tell us more about how
things are progressing. We are, however, missing a tracepoint to track
active list aging. Introduce mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active which reports
the number of scanned, rotated, deactivated and
From: Michal Hocko
Our reclaim process has several tracepoints to tell us more about how
things are progressing. We are, however, missing a tracepoint to track
active list aging. Introduce mm_vmscan_lru_shrink_active which reports
the number of scanned, rotated, deactivated and freed pages from
42 matches
Mail list logo