Re: [PATCH 2/9] ARM: imx: MACH_MX31ADS_WM1133_EV1 needs REGULATOR_WM8350

2013-02-15 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:47:44PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > MACH_MX31ADS_WM1133_EV1 already depends on REGULATOR_WM8350, > but that still allows REGULATOR_WM8350 to be a loadable > module. Depending on REGULATOR_WM8350 to be built-in > ensures we cannot create a broken configuration. > >

Re: [PATCH 2/9] ARM: imx: MACH_MX31ADS_WM1133_EV1 needs REGULATOR_WM8350

2013-02-15 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:47:44PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: MACH_MX31ADS_WM1133_EV1 already depends on REGULATOR_WM8350, but that still allows REGULATOR_WM8350 to be a loadable module. Depending on REGULATOR_WM8350 to be built-in ensures we cannot create a broken configuration. Without

[PATCH 2/9] ARM: imx: MACH_MX31ADS_WM1133_EV1 needs REGULATOR_WM8350

2013-02-14 Thread Arnd Bergmann
MACH_MX31ADS_WM1133_EV1 already depends on REGULATOR_WM8350, but that still allows REGULATOR_WM8350 to be a loadable module. Depending on REGULATOR_WM8350 to be built-in ensures we cannot create a broken configuration. Without this patch, building allmodconfig results in:

[PATCH 2/9] ARM: imx: MACH_MX31ADS_WM1133_EV1 needs REGULATOR_WM8350

2013-02-14 Thread Arnd Bergmann
MACH_MX31ADS_WM1133_EV1 already depends on REGULATOR_WM8350, but that still allows REGULATOR_WM8350 to be a loadable module. Depending on REGULATOR_WM8350 to be built-in ensures we cannot create a broken configuration. Without this patch, building allmodconfig results in: