Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc2] I2C: lm80 driver improvement (From Aurelien) - Resubmit #2

On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 12:31:30PM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote: > Here is the corrected fix, yeah that didn't make > sense. > 3AM isn't a good time to send patches I guess :-) Care to resend it, with a full description and a Signed-off-by: line so I can apply it? thanks, greg k-h - To

Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc2] I2C: lm80 driver improvement (From Aurelien) - Resubmit #2

On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 12:31:30PM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote: Here is the corrected fix, yeah that didn't make sense. 3AM isn't a good time to send patches I guess :-) Care to resend it, with a full description and a Signed-off-by: line so I can apply it? thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc2] I2C: lm80 driver improvement (From Aurelien) - Resubmit #2

Here is the corrected fix, yeah that didn't make sense. 3AM isn't a good time to send patches I guess :-) --- Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 02:57:35AM -0500, Shawn > Starr wrote: > > static inline unsigned char FAN_TO_REG(unsigned > rpm, unsigned div) > > { >

Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc2] I2C: lm80 driver improvement (From Aurelien) - Resubmit #2

Here is the corrected fix, yeah that didn't make sense. 3AM isn't a good time to send patches I guess :-) --- Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 02:57:35AM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote: static inline unsigned char FAN_TO_REG(unsigned rpm, unsigned div) { - if