Re: [PATCH 2.6.19] mmc: Fix handling of response types in imxmmc and tifm drivers

2007-01-10 Thread Pierre Ossman
Pavel Pisa wrote: > I have tested your patch. > Kernel builds. I have not found much time for testing. > But I would not like to block changes and I am going > for next week to project meeting in Spain, so there is > my reply. > > I have 2.6.19 + realtime-patches rt14 on the hand. > I have been abl

Re: [PATCH 2.6.19] mmc: Fix handling of response types in imxmmc and tifm drivers

2007-01-08 Thread Pavel Pisa
Hello Philip, On Thursday 04 January 2007 16:04, Philip Langdale wrote: > This change depends on my SDHC patch and fixes a bug that was revealed > during the development of that patch. The R6 response type should be > identical to R1 (and R7) but was incorrectly defined differently. Fixing > the R

[PATCH 2.6.19] mmc: Fix handling of response types in imxmmc and tifm drivers

2007-01-04 Thread Philip Langdale
This change depends on my SDHC patch and fixes a bug that was revealed during the development of that patch. The R6 response type should be identical to R1 (and R7) but was incorrectly defined differently. Fixing the R6 definition breaks assumptions in these two drivers that response type flags