Move the x86 arch objects building under build framework
to be included in the libperf build object.
Adding also arch/$(ARCH)/Build files for the rest of the
archs. The reason for this is that in arch/Build we now do:
+libperf-y += $(ARCH)/
which would make the build to fail on other
Move the x86 arch objects building under build framework
to be included in the libperf build object.
Adding also arch/$(ARCH)/Build files for the rest of the
archs. The reason for this is that in arch/Build we now do:
+libperf-y += $(ARCH)/
which would make the build to fail on other
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 02:45:56PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> On 1/21/15 2:31 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >the thing is that in arch/Build we now do:
> >
> >+libperf-y += $(ARCH)/
> >
> >which would make the build to fail on other architectures,
> >because the build framework requires 'Build' file in
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 02:45:56PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
On 1/21/15 2:31 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
the thing is that in arch/Build we now do:
+libperf-y += $(ARCH)/
which would make the build to fail on other architectures,
because the build framework requires 'Build' file in
nested
On 1/21/15 2:31 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
the thing is that in arch/Build we now do:
+libperf-y += $(ARCH)/
which would make the build to fail on other architectures,
because the build framework requires 'Build' file in
nested directories.. and this patch adds it only for x86
ok. perhaps add that
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 02:17:48PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> On 1/20/15 9:39 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >---
> > tools/perf/arch/Build | 1 +
> > tools/perf/arch/arm/Build | 0
> > tools/perf/arch/arm64/Build | 0
> > tools/perf/arch/powerpc/Build | 0
> >
On 1/20/15 9:39 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
---
tools/perf/arch/Build | 1 +
tools/perf/arch/arm/Build | 0
tools/perf/arch/arm64/Build | 0
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/Build | 0
tools/perf/arch/s390/Build | 0
tools/perf/arch/sh/Build| 0
On 1/20/15 9:39 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
---
tools/perf/arch/Build | 1 +
tools/perf/arch/arm/Build | 0
tools/perf/arch/arm64/Build | 0
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/Build | 0
tools/perf/arch/s390/Build | 0
tools/perf/arch/sh/Build| 0
On 1/21/15 2:31 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
the thing is that in arch/Build we now do:
+libperf-y += $(ARCH)/
which would make the build to fail on other architectures,
because the build framework requires 'Build' file in
nested directories.. and this patch adds it only for x86
ok. perhaps add that
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 02:17:48PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
On 1/20/15 9:39 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
---
tools/perf/arch/Build | 1 +
tools/perf/arch/arm/Build | 0
tools/perf/arch/arm64/Build | 0
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/Build | 0
tools/perf/arch/s390/Build
Move the x86 arch objects building under build framework
to be included in the libperf build object.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa
Cc: Alexis Berlemont
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Cc: Borislav Petkov
Cc: Corey Ashford
Cc: David Ahern
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker
Cc: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Namhyung Kim
Move the x86 arch objects building under build framework
to be included in the libperf build object.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa jo...@kernel.org
Cc: Alexis Berlemont alexis.berlem...@gmail.com
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo a...@redhat.com
Cc: Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de
Cc: Corey Ashford
Move the x86 arch objects building under build framework
to be included in the libperf build object.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa
Cc: Alexis Berlemont
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Cc: Borislav Petkov
Cc: Corey Ashford
Cc: David Ahern
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker
Cc: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Namhyung Kim
Move the x86 arch objects building under build framework
to be included in the libperf build object.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa jo...@kernel.org
Cc: Alexis Berlemont alexis.berlem...@gmail.com
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo a...@redhat.com
Cc: Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de
Cc: Corey Ashford
14 matches
Mail list logo
