On 15 April 2014 01:22, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 04/14/14 09:23, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> We have already checked if 'cpu' is online or not and so don't need to
>> recheck
>> it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
>
> Hm... doing some git archeology shows fa116ea35ec7 (nohz: no softirq
> pending wa
On 04/14/14 09:23, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> We have already checked if 'cpu' is online or not and so don't need to recheck
> it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
Hm... doing some git archeology shows fa116ea35ec7 (nohz: no softirq
pending warnings for offline cpus, 2008-12-11), where the cpu_online()
We have already checked if 'cpu' is online or not and so don't need to recheck
it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
---
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 9cbba513..c81b6cf 100644
--- a
3 matches
Mail list logo