Re: [PATCH 25/49] mm: numa: Add fault driven placement and migration

2013-01-04 Thread Simon Jeons
On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 10:23 +, Mel Gorman wrote: > From: Peter Zijlstra > > NOTE: This patch is based on "sched, numa, mm: Add fault driven > placement and migration policy" but as it throws away all the policy > to just leave a basic foundation I had to drop the signed-offs-by.

Re: [PATCH 25/49] mm: numa: Add fault driven placement and migration

2013-01-04 Thread Simon Jeons
On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 10:23 +, Mel Gorman wrote: From: Peter Zijlstra a.p.zijls...@chello.nl NOTE: This patch is based on sched, numa, mm: Add fault driven placement and migration policy but as it throws away all the policy to just leave a basic foundation I had to drop the

[PATCH 25/49] mm: numa: Add fault driven placement and migration

2012-12-07 Thread Mel Gorman
From: Peter Zijlstra NOTE: This patch is based on "sched, numa, mm: Add fault driven placement and migration policy" but as it throws away all the policy to just leave a basic foundation I had to drop the signed-offs-by. This patch creates a bare-bones method for setting PTEs

[PATCH 25/49] mm: numa: Add fault driven placement and migration

2012-12-07 Thread Mel Gorman
From: Peter Zijlstra a.p.zijls...@chello.nl NOTE: This patch is based on sched, numa, mm: Add fault driven placement and migration policy but as it throws away all the policy to just leave a basic foundation I had to drop the signed-offs-by. This patch creates a bare-bones method