Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: Do not modify LIMITEDADDRESS on new architectures

2015-01-26 Thread Roger Quadros
On 26/01/15 15:07, Sam Protsenko wrote: > On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Roger Quadros wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 24/01/15 22:28, Semen Protsenko wrote: >>> New OMAP-based architectures (like OMAP5, DRA7XX, AM572X) don't have >>> LIMITEDADDRESS bit in GPMC_CONFIG register (this bit marked as >>>

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: Do not modify LIMITEDADDRESS on new architectures

2015-01-26 Thread Sam Protsenko
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Roger Quadros wrote: > Hi, > > On 24/01/15 22:28, Semen Protsenko wrote: >> New OMAP-based architectures (like OMAP5, DRA7XX, AM572X) don't have >> LIMITEDADDRESS bit in GPMC_CONFIG register (this bit marked as >> RESERVED). Seems like these SoCs have new

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: Do not modify LIMITEDADDRESS on new architectures

2015-01-26 Thread Roger Quadros
Hi, On 24/01/15 22:28, Semen Protsenko wrote: > New OMAP-based architectures (like OMAP5, DRA7XX, AM572X) don't have > LIMITEDADDRESS bit in GPMC_CONFIG register (this bit marked as > RESERVED). Seems like these SoCs have new revision of GPMC IP-core > (despite of same GPMC_REVISION value as for

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: Do not modify LIMITEDADDRESS on new architectures

2015-01-26 Thread Sam Protsenko
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Roger Quadros rog...@ti.com wrote: Hi, On 24/01/15 22:28, Semen Protsenko wrote: New OMAP-based architectures (like OMAP5, DRA7XX, AM572X) don't have LIMITEDADDRESS bit in GPMC_CONFIG register (this bit marked as RESERVED). Seems like these SoCs have new

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: Do not modify LIMITEDADDRESS on new architectures

2015-01-26 Thread Roger Quadros
On 26/01/15 15:07, Sam Protsenko wrote: On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Roger Quadros rog...@ti.com wrote: Hi, On 24/01/15 22:28, Semen Protsenko wrote: New OMAP-based architectures (like OMAP5, DRA7XX, AM572X) don't have LIMITEDADDRESS bit in GPMC_CONFIG register (this bit marked as

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: Do not modify LIMITEDADDRESS on new architectures

2015-01-26 Thread Roger Quadros
Hi, On 24/01/15 22:28, Semen Protsenko wrote: New OMAP-based architectures (like OMAP5, DRA7XX, AM572X) don't have LIMITEDADDRESS bit in GPMC_CONFIG register (this bit marked as RESERVED). Seems like these SoCs have new revision of GPMC IP-core (despite of same GPMC_REVISION value as for

[PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: Do not modify LIMITEDADDRESS on new architectures

2015-01-24 Thread Semen Protsenko
New OMAP-based architectures (like OMAP5, DRA7XX, AM572X) don't have LIMITEDADDRESS bit in GPMC_CONFIG register (this bit marked as RESERVED). Seems like these SoCs have new revision of GPMC IP-core (despite of same GPMC_REVISION value as for earlier SoCs). According to OMAP5 TRM: "Nonmultiplexed

[PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: Do not modify LIMITEDADDRESS on new architectures

2015-01-24 Thread Semen Protsenko
New OMAP-based architectures (like OMAP5, DRA7XX, AM572X) don't have LIMITEDADDRESS bit in GPMC_CONFIG register (this bit marked as RESERVED). Seems like these SoCs have new revision of GPMC IP-core (despite of same GPMC_REVISION value as for earlier SoCs). According to OMAP5 TRM: Nonmultiplexed