Hi Viresh,
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 17 April 2014 15:23, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> If the clock doesn't exist, clk_get_rate() returns -EINVAL
>
> You clk_get_rate() isn't written well then, it should return zero.
You're right, thanks!
Once again I looked at t
On 17 April 2014 15:23, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> If the clock doesn't exist, clk_get_rate() returns -EINVAL
You clk_get_rate() isn't written well then, it should return zero.
@Mike: I didn't see this clearly mentioned in clk.h, should we fix
that?
>, which becomes
> a large number (freq is u3
If the clock doesn't exist, clk_get_rate() returns -EINVAL, which becomes
a large number (freq is u32), failing the "freq < min_cpufreq" test.
Explicitly test for "(u32)-EINVAL" to fix this.
Update the comment, and fix a grammer issue while we're at it.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
---
dri
3 matches
Mail list logo
