Hi,
On 01.12.2014 11:05, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Sun 30-11-14 00:37:38, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
>> Before flag FAN_ONDIR was implicitly set in a marks ignored mask. This led to
>> some inconsistent behaviour:
>>
>> 1. It was not possible to remove the flag from the ignored mask, once it was
>> set
On Sun 30-11-14 00:37:38, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> Before flag FAN_ONDIR was implicitly set in a marks ignored mask. This led to
> some inconsistent behaviour:
>
> 1. It was not possible to remove the flag from the ignored mask, once it was
> set
> (implicitly) with a call like
>
>
Hi,
On 01.12.2014 11:05, Jan Kara wrote:
On Sun 30-11-14 00:37:38, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
Before flag FAN_ONDIR was implicitly set in a marks ignored mask. This led to
some inconsistent behaviour:
1. It was not possible to remove the flag from the ignored mask, once it was
set
On Sun 30-11-14 00:37:38, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
Before flag FAN_ONDIR was implicitly set in a marks ignored mask. This led to
some inconsistent behaviour:
1. It was not possible to remove the flag from the ignored mask, once it was
set
(implicitly) with a call like
fanotify_mark(fd,
Before flag FAN_ONDIR was implicitly set in a marks ignored mask. This led to
some inconsistent behaviour:
1. It was not possible to remove the flag from the ignored mask, once it was set
(implicitly) with a call like
fanotify_mark(fd, FAN_MARK_ADD, FAN_OPEN, AT_FDCWD, "dir");
This was since
Before flag FAN_ONDIR was implicitly set in a marks ignored mask. This led to
some inconsistent behaviour:
1. It was not possible to remove the flag from the ignored mask, once it was set
(implicitly) with a call like
fanotify_mark(fd, FAN_MARK_ADD, FAN_OPEN, AT_FDCWD, dir);
This was since the
6 matches
Mail list logo
