Re: [PATCH 3/3] fs: fix corner case race on freeze_bdev() when sb disappears

On Fri 20-04-18 16:59:04, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > freeze_bdev() will bail but leave the bd_fsfreeze_count incremented > if the get_active_super() does not find the superblock on our > super_blocks list to match. > > This issue has been present since v2.6.29 during the introduction of the >

Re: [PATCH 3/3] fs: fix corner case race on freeze_bdev() when sb disappears

On Fri 20-04-18 16:59:04, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > freeze_bdev() will bail but leave the bd_fsfreeze_count incremented > if the get_active_super() does not find the superblock on our > super_blocks list to match. > > This issue has been present since v2.6.29 during the introduction of the >

[PATCH 3/3] fs: fix corner case race on freeze_bdev() when sb disappears

freeze_bdev() will bail but leave the bd_fsfreeze_count incremented if the get_active_super() does not find the superblock on our super_blocks list to match. This issue has been present since v2.6.29 during the introduction of the ioctl_fsfreeze() and ioctl_fsthaw() via commit fcccf502540e3

[PATCH 3/3] fs: fix corner case race on freeze_bdev() when sb disappears

freeze_bdev() will bail but leave the bd_fsfreeze_count incremented if the get_active_super() does not find the superblock on our super_blocks list to match. This issue has been present since v2.6.29 during the introduction of the ioctl_fsfreeze() and ioctl_fsthaw() via commit fcccf502540e3