On 17/02/15 15:48, Robert Abel wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>
>> Can you please point out which DT had used this pre-divided workaround? We
>> will have to
>> fix those then.
>
> I didn't check. A cursory glance reveals all DTS in arch/arm/boot/
Hi Roger,
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>
> Can you please point out which DT had used this pre-divided workaround? We
> will have to
> fix those then.
I didn't check. A cursory glance reveals all DTS in arch/arm/boot/dts
to use a value of 0.
>
> Can you please rebase
Robert,
On 16/02/15 17:49, Robert ABEL wrote:
> WAITMONITORINGTIME is expressed in GPMC_CLK cycles (even for asynchronous
> accesses).
> However the driver currently converts them to GPMC_FCLK cycles, thus
> waitmonitoringtime in dt
> had to be predivided by divider as a workaround. This patch f
WAITMONITORINGTIME is expressed in GPMC_CLK cycles (even for asynchronous
accesses).
However the driver currently converts them to GPMC_FCLK cycles, thus
waitmonitoringtime in dt
had to be predivided by divider as a workaround. This patch fixes the issue by
reading the
current GPMCFCLKDIVIDER an
4 matches
Mail list logo
