Il 06/04/2013 15:20, Matthew Wilcox ha scritto:
On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 12:05:52PM +0200, Marco Stornelli wrote:
In every place where sb_start_pagefault was called now we must manage
the error code and return VM_FAULT_RETRY.
Erm ... in patch 1/4:
static inline void
On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 12:05:52PM +0200, Marco Stornelli wrote:
> In every place where sb_start_pagefault was called now we must manage
> the error code and return VM_FAULT_RETRY.
Erm ... in patch 1/4:
static inline void sb_start_pagefault(struct super_block *sb)
{
-
In every place where sb_start_pagefault was called now we must manage
the error code and return VM_FAULT_RETRY.
Signed-off-by: Marco Stornelli
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c |4 +++-
fs/buffer.c|4 +++-
fs/ext4/inode.c|4 +++-
fs/f2fs/file.c |4 +++-
fs/gfs2/file.c |
In every place where sb_start_pagefault was called now we must manage
the error code and return VM_FAULT_RETRY.
Signed-off-by: Marco Stornelli marco.storne...@gmail.com
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c |4 +++-
fs/buffer.c|4 +++-
fs/ext4/inode.c|4 +++-
fs/f2fs/file.c |4
On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 12:05:52PM +0200, Marco Stornelli wrote:
In every place where sb_start_pagefault was called now we must manage
the error code and return VM_FAULT_RETRY.
Erm ... in patch 1/4:
static inline void sb_start_pagefault(struct super_block *sb)
{
- __sb_start_write(sb,
Il 06/04/2013 15:20, Matthew Wilcox ha scritto:
On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 12:05:52PM +0200, Marco Stornelli wrote:
In every place where sb_start_pagefault was called now we must manage
the error code and return VM_FAULT_RETRY.
Erm ... in patch 1/4:
static inline void
6 matches
Mail list logo