On Tue, 6 May 2014 17:47:16 -0400
Dan Streetman wrote:
> well the specific reason in swap's case is the need to use
> same-priority entries in a round-robin basis, but I don't know if
> plist_round_robin() is very clear.
No, that's not very clear.
>
> Maybe plist_demote()? Although demote
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 6 May 2014 16:12:54 -0400
> Dan Streetman wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2 May 2014 15:02:29 -0400
>> > Dan Streetman wrote:
>> >
>> >> Add plist_rotate(), which moves the
On Tue, 6 May 2014 16:12:54 -0400
Dan Streetman wrote:
> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 May 2014 15:02:29 -0400
> > Dan Streetman wrote:
> >
> >> Add plist_rotate(), which moves the specified plist_node after
> >> all other same-priority plist_nodes in
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2 May 2014 15:02:29 -0400
> Dan Streetman wrote:
>
>> Add plist_rotate(), which moves the specified plist_node after
>> all other same-priority plist_nodes in the list.
>
> This is a little confusing? You mean it takes a
On Tue, 6 May 2014 17:47:16 -0400
Dan Streetman ddstr...@ieee.org wrote:
well the specific reason in swap's case is the need to use
same-priority entries in a round-robin basis, but I don't know if
plist_round_robin() is very clear.
No, that's not very clear.
Maybe plist_demote()?
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Fri, 2 May 2014 15:02:29 -0400
Dan Streetman ddstr...@ieee.org wrote:
Add plist_rotate(), which moves the specified plist_node after
all other same-priority plist_nodes in the list.
This is a little confusing?
On Tue, 6 May 2014 16:12:54 -0400
Dan Streetman ddstr...@ieee.org wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Fri, 2 May 2014 15:02:29 -0400
Dan Streetman ddstr...@ieee.org wrote:
Add plist_rotate(), which moves the specified plist_node after
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Tue, 6 May 2014 16:12:54 -0400
Dan Streetman ddstr...@ieee.org wrote:
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Fri, 2 May 2014 15:02:29 -0400
Dan Streetman ddstr...@ieee.org
On Fri, 2 May 2014 15:02:29 -0400
Dan Streetman wrote:
> Add plist_rotate(), which moves the specified plist_node after
> all other same-priority plist_nodes in the list.
This is a little confusing? You mean it takes a plist_node from a plist
and simply moves it to the end of the list of all
On Fri, 2 May 2014 15:02:29 -0400
Dan Streetman ddstr...@ieee.org wrote:
Add plist_rotate(), which moves the specified plist_node after
all other same-priority plist_nodes in the list.
This is a little confusing? You mean it takes a plist_node from a plist
and simply moves it to the end of
Add plist_rotate(), which moves the specified plist_node after
all other same-priority plist_nodes in the list.
This is needed by swap, which has a plist of swap_info_structs
and needs to use each same-priority swap_info_struct equally.
Also add plist_test_rotate() test function, for use by
Add plist_rotate(), which moves the specified plist_node after
all other same-priority plist_nodes in the list.
This is needed by swap, which has a plist of swap_info_structs
and needs to use each same-priority swap_info_struct equally.
Also add plist_test_rotate() test function, for use by
12 matches
Mail list logo
