On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 12:15:00PM +0200, Michael Grzeschik wrote:
> we should not play to much with generous functions for this pmics. With this
> patch we loose the fix_io code path from da9052_reg_update.
> I suggest that Mark queue the revert of this patch.
This seems far too obscure to be
Hi Axel, Mark,
we should not play to much with generous functions for this pmics. With this
patch we loose the fix_io code path from da9052_reg_update.
include/linux/mfd/da9052.h
...
if (da9052->fix_io) {
ret = da9052->fix_io(da9052, reg);
if (ret < 0)
Hi Axel, Mark,
we should not play to much with generous functions for this pmics. With this
patch we loose the fix_io code path from da9052_reg_update.
include/linux/mfd/da9052.h
...
if (da9052-fix_io) {
ret = da9052-fix_io(da9052, reg);
if (ret 0)
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 12:15:00PM +0200, Michael Grzeschik wrote:
we should not play to much with generous functions for this pmics. With this
patch we loose the fix_io code path from da9052_reg_update.
I suggest that Mark queue the revert of this patch.
This seems far too obscure to be
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin
---
drivers/regulator/da9052-regulator.c | 41 +-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/da9052-regulator.c
b/drivers/regulator/da9052-regulator.c
index d096309..c6d8651 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin axel@ingics.com
---
drivers/regulator/da9052-regulator.c | 41 +-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/da9052-regulator.c
b/drivers/regulator/da9052-regulator.c
index d096309..c6d8651 100644
6 matches
Mail list logo