Hi,
On 26.01.21 16:29, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-01-24 at 17:47 +0100, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
>> Hi Jarkko,
>>
>> On 17.01.21 at 19:13, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>>> I have hard time to believe that any of these patches are based on
>>> actual regressions.
>>>
>>> /Jarko
>>>
>> patch 1 is
On Sun, 2021-01-24 at 17:47 +0100, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
>
> Hi Jarkko,
>
> On 17.01.21 at 19:13, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> >
> > I have hard time to believe that any of these patches are based on
> > actual regressions.
> >
> > /Jarko
> >
>
> patch 1 is indeed wrong (I oversaw the action cal
Hi Jarkko,
On 17.01.21 at 19:13, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>
> I have hard time to believe that any of these patches are based on
> actual regressions.
>
> /Jarko
>
patch 1 is indeed wrong (I oversaw the action call in case of error),
so please ignore it.
However patches 2 and 3 are based on bugs
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 02:22:40AM +0100, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> From: Lino Sanfilippo
>
> In tpm2_del_space() the sessions are flushed by means of the tpm_chip
> operations. However the concerning operations pointer my already be NULL at
> this time in case that the chip has been unregistered
From: Lino Sanfilippo
In tpm2_del_space() the sessions are flushed by means of the tpm_chip
operations. However the concerning operations pointer my already be NULL at
this time in case that the chip has been unregistered (see
tpm_chip_unregister() which calls tpm_del_char_device() which sets
chi
5 matches
Mail list logo