Dear Linus Walleij,
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:56:03 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > Unfortunately, this creates the following warning at boot time for each
> > GPIO bank:
>
> Grant has a patch in his irqdomain tree that will turn this warning into
> a simple pr_info() thing instead. It's not that
Dear Linus Walleij,
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:56:03 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
Unfortunately, this creates the following warning at boot time for each
GPIO bank:
Grant has a patch in his irqdomain tree that will turn this warning into
a simple pr_info() thing instead. It's not that bad...
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Thomas Petazzoni
wrote:
> Unfortunately, this creates the following warning at boot time for each
> GPIO bank:
Grant has a patch in his irqdomain tree that will turn this warning into
a simple pr_info() thing instead. It's not that bad... The immediate
problem
Dear Linus Walleij,
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:54:02 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> The MVEBU driver probably just wants a few IRQs. Using the simple
> domain has the upside of allocating IRQ descriptors if need be,
> especially in a SPARSE_IRQ environment.
Unfortunately, this creates the following
Dear Linus Walleij,
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:54:02 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
The MVEBU driver probably just wants a few IRQs. Using the simple
domain has the upside of allocating IRQ descriptors if need be,
especially in a SPARSE_IRQ environment.
Unfortunately, this creates the following
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Thomas Petazzoni
thomas.petazz...@free-electrons.com wrote:
Unfortunately, this creates the following warning at boot time for each
GPIO bank:
Grant has a patch in his irqdomain tree that will turn this warning into
a simple pr_info() thing instead. It's not
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:54:02 +0200, Linus Walleij
wrote:
> The MVEBU driver probably just wants a few IRQs. Using the simple
> domain has the upside of allocating IRQ descriptors if need be,
> especially in a SPARSE_IRQ environment.
>
> Cc: Rob Herring
> Cc: Grant Likely
> Cc: Thomas
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:54:02 +0200, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org
wrote:
The MVEBU driver probably just wants a few IRQs. Using the simple
domain has the upside of allocating IRQ descriptors if need be,
especially in a SPARSE_IRQ environment.
Cc: Rob Herring rob.herr...@calxeda.com
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:54:02PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> The MVEBU driver probably just wants a few IRQs. Using the simple
> domain has the upside of allocating IRQ descriptors if need be,
> especially in a SPARSE_IRQ environment.
>
> Cc: Rob Herring
> Cc: Grant Likely
> Cc: Thomas
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:54:02PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
The MVEBU driver probably just wants a few IRQs. Using the simple
domain has the upside of allocating IRQ descriptors if need be,
especially in a SPARSE_IRQ environment.
Cc: Rob Herring rob.herr...@calxeda.com
Cc: Grant Likely
The MVEBU driver probably just wants a few IRQs. Using the simple
domain has the upside of allocating IRQ descriptors if need be,
especially in a SPARSE_IRQ environment.
Cc: Rob Herring
Cc: Grant Likely
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni
Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth
Cc: Andrew Lunn
Signed-off-by: Linus
The MVEBU driver probably just wants a few IRQs. Using the simple
domain has the upside of allocating IRQ descriptors if need be,
especially in a SPARSE_IRQ environment.
Cc: Rob Herring rob.herr...@calxeda.com
Cc: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni
12 matches
Mail list logo
