On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:08:35PM -0400, Raphaël Beamonte wrote:
> The MACRO_WILC_BUFFER() macro was using a return statement, and didn't
> take care of possible memory leaks and subsequent bugs when it was failing
> after succeeding some allocations. This patch corrects this behavior.
>
>
The MACRO_WILC_BUFFER() macro was using a return statement, and didn't
take care of possible memory leaks and subsequent bugs when it was failing
after succeeding some allocations. This patch corrects this behavior.
Signed-off-by: Raphaël Beamonte
---
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:08:35PM -0400, Raphaël Beamonte wrote:
The MACRO_WILC_BUFFER() macro was using a return statement, and didn't
take care of possible memory leaks and subsequent bugs when it was failing
after succeeding some allocations. This patch corrects this behavior.
The MACRO_WILC_BUFFER() macro was using a return statement, and didn't
take care of possible memory leaks and subsequent bugs when it was failing
after succeeding some allocations. This patch corrects this behavior.
Signed-off-by: Raphaël Beamonte raphael.beamo...@gmail.com
---
4 matches
Mail list logo