On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 04:08:24PM +, Peter Huewe wrote:
> Wait states are signaled in the last byte received from the TPM in
> response to the header, not the first byte. Check rx_buf[3] instead of
> rx_buf[0].
>
> Cc:
> Fixes: 0edbfea537d1 ("tpm/tpm_tis_spi: Add support for spi phy")
> Sign
Am 17. Februar 2017 06:09:30 MEZ schrieb Christophe Ricard
:
>That's is correct, this is a mistake on my side and never saw it :-(.
>
>I guess it was possibly leading to "waste" at least 1 wait state on
>some
>TPMs.
Unfortunately the 1 for indicating end of waitstates does only appear once so
That's is correct, this is a mistake on my side and never saw it :-(.
I guess it was possibly leading to "waste" at least 1 wait state on some
TPMs.
Wouldn't it be better to merge that with #1 and update the comment
consequently?
On 16/02/2017 08:08, Peter Huewe wrote:
Wait states are sig
Wait states are signaled in the last byte received from the TPM in
response to the header, not the first byte. Check rx_buf[3] instead of
rx_buf[0].
Cc:
Fixes: 0edbfea537d1 ("tpm/tpm_tis_spi: Add support for spi phy")
Signed-off-by: Alexander Steffen
Signed-off-by: Peter Huewe
---
drivers/char
4 matches
Mail list logo