Re: [PATCH 3/9] i2c: i2c-mxs: replace platform_driver_probe to support deferred probing

2013-10-08 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Wolfram Sang, > Subsystems like pinctrl and gpio rightfully make use of deferred probing at > core level. Now, deferred drivers won't be retried if they don't have a > .probe function specified in the driver struct. Fix this driver to have > that, so the devices it supports won't get lost in

[PATCH 3/9] i2c: i2c-mxs: replace platform_driver_probe to support deferred probing

2013-10-08 Thread Wolfram Sang
Subsystems like pinctrl and gpio rightfully make use of deferred probing at core level. Now, deferred drivers won't be retried if they don't have a .probe function specified in the driver struct. Fix this driver to have that, so the devices it supports won't get lost in a deferred probe.

[PATCH 3/9] i2c: i2c-mxs: replace platform_driver_probe to support deferred probing

2013-10-08 Thread Wolfram Sang
Subsystems like pinctrl and gpio rightfully make use of deferred probing at core level. Now, deferred drivers won't be retried if they don't have a .probe function specified in the driver struct. Fix this driver to have that, so the devices it supports won't get lost in a deferred probe.

Re: [PATCH 3/9] i2c: i2c-mxs: replace platform_driver_probe to support deferred probing

2013-10-08 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Wolfram Sang, Subsystems like pinctrl and gpio rightfully make use of deferred probing at core level. Now, deferred drivers won't be retried if they don't have a .probe function specified in the driver struct. Fix this driver to have that, so the devices it supports won't get lost in a