Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/119] 3.12.64-stable review

2016-10-03 Thread Jiri Slaby
On 09/29/2016, 04:22 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Build results: > total: 128 pass: 128 fail: 0 > Qemu test results: > total: 85 pass: 85 fail: 0 > > Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders. On 09/29/2016, 07:10 PM, Shuah Khan wrote: > Compiled and booted on my test

Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/119] 3.12.64-stable review

2016-10-03 Thread Jiri Slaby
On 09/29/2016, 04:22 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Build results: > total: 128 pass: 128 fail: 0 > Qemu test results: > total: 85 pass: 85 fail: 0 > > Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders. On 09/29/2016, 07:10 PM, Shuah Khan wrote: > Compiled and booted on my test

Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/119] 3.12.64-stable review

2016-09-30 Thread Jiri Slaby
On 09/30/2016, 07:28 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote: > This one seems to be missing. > > 135e8c9250dd sched/core: Fix a race between try_to_wake_up() and a woken up > task Applied now for 3.12.65, thanks! -- js suse labs

Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/119] 3.12.64-stable review

2016-09-30 Thread Jiri Slaby
On 09/30/2016, 07:28 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote: > This one seems to be missing. > > 135e8c9250dd sched/core: Fix a race between try_to_wake_up() and a woken up > task Applied now for 3.12.65, thanks! -- js suse labs

Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/119] 3.12.64-stable review

2016-09-29 Thread Mike Galbraith
This one seems to be missing. 135e8c9250dd sched/core: Fix a race between try_to_wake_up() and a woken up task

Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/119] 3.12.64-stable review

2016-09-29 Thread Mike Galbraith
This one seems to be missing. 135e8c9250dd sched/core: Fix a race between try_to_wake_up() and a woken up task

Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/119] 3.12.64-stable review

2016-09-29 Thread Shuah Khan
On 09/29/2016 04:25 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.64 release. > There are 119 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should

Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/119] 3.12.64-stable review

2016-09-29 Thread Shuah Khan
On 09/29/2016 04:25 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.64 release. > There are 119 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should

Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/119] 3.12.64-stable review

2016-09-29 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 09/29/2016 03:25 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.64 release. There are 119 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by

Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/119] 3.12.64-stable review

2016-09-29 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 09/29/2016 03:25 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.64 release. There are 119 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by

[PATCH 3.12 000/119] 3.12.64-stable review

2016-09-29 Thread Jiri Slaby
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.64 release. There are 119 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Mon Oct 3 12:25:22 CEST 2016. Anything

[PATCH 3.12 000/119] 3.12.64-stable review

2016-09-29 Thread Jiri Slaby
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.64 release. There are 119 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be made by Mon Oct 3 12:25:22 CEST 2016. Anything