Re: [PATCH 3.16 315/410] btrfs: use proper endianness accessors for super_copy

On Fri, 2018-06-08 at 04:02 +0800, Anand Jain wrote: > Hi Ben, > > This patch was reverted from the mainline and 4.14 stable as it only > added half of the endianness conversion and caused regression. This > patch should not be included. Oh yes, sorry I didn't spot that. I'll drop it. Ben

Re: [PATCH 3.16 315/410] btrfs: use proper endianness accessors for super_copy

Hi Ben, This patch was reverted from the mainline and 4.14 stable as it only added half of the endianness conversion and caused regression. This patch should not be included. Thanks, Anand On 06/07/2018 10:05 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: 3.16.57-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objection

[PATCH 3.16 315/410] btrfs: use proper endianness accessors for super_copy

3.16.57-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Anand Jain commit 3c181c12c431fe33b669410d663beb9cceefcd1b upstream. The fs_info::super_copy is a byte copy of the on-disk structure and all members must use the accessor macros/functions to o