On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 01:13:27AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 09:22:35AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > From a80e49e2cc3145af014a8ae44f575829cc236192 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Frederic Weisbecker
> > > Subject: nohz: Move nohz full init call to
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 09:22:35AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > From a80e49e2cc3145af014a8ae44f575829cc236192 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Frederic Weisbecker
> > Subject: nohz: Move nohz full init call to tick init
> >
> > From c5c38ef3d70377dc504a6a3f611a3ec814bc757b Mon Sep 17
:00:00 2001
> > > > > From: Frederic Weisbecker
> > > > > Subject: irq_work: Force raised irq work to run on irq work interrupt
> > > > >
> > > > > From 3010279f0fc36f0388872203e63ca49912f648fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > > >
00 2001
> > > > From: Frederic Weisbecker
> > > > Subject: irq_work: Force raised irq work to run on irq work interrupt
> > > >
> > > > From 3010279f0fc36f0388872203e63ca49912f648fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > > From: Frederic Weisbecker
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:44:14 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 09:22:35AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>
>> Doesn't build in 3.17 properly :(
>
> Older kernels can use rcu_note_context_switch() instead of
> rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch(), which didn't show up
elf IPI support
> > >
> > > From 09f6edd424218eb69078551b2ecfada1f2d098eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Frederic Weisbecker
> > > Subject: arm: Tell irq work about self IPI support
> > >
> > > From 3631073659d0aafeaa52227bb61a100efaf901d
gt; From 09f6edd424218eb69078551b2ecfada1f2d098eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Frederic Weisbecker
> > Subject: arm: Tell irq work about self IPI support
> >
> > From 3631073659d0aafeaa52227bb61a100efaf901dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Frederic Wei
f2d098eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Frederic Weisbecker
> Subject: arm: Tell irq work about self IPI support
>
> From 3631073659d0aafeaa52227bb61a100efaf901dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Frederic Weisbecker
To: 09f6edd424218eb69078551b2ecfada1f2d098eb
To: Chuck Ebbert
Cc:
3631073659d0aafeaa52227bb61a100efaf901dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com
To: 09f6edd424218eb69078551b2ecfada1f2d098eb
To: Chuck Ebbert cebbert.l...@gmail.com
Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@hmh.eng.br,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sta...@kernel.org
Bcc:
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.17 00/25
: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@hmh.eng.br,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sta...@kernel.org
Bcc:
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.17 00/25] 3.17.1-stable review
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: 20141013082319.175d90bb@as
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 08:23:19AM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 08:28
Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com
To: 09f6edd424218eb69078551b2ecfada1f2d098eb
To: Chuck Ebbert cebbert.l...@gmail.com
Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@hmh.eng.br,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sta...@kernel.org
Bcc:
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.17 00/25] 3.17.1-stable review
Reply
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:44:14 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 09:22:35AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
Doesn't build in 3.17 properly :(
Older kernels can use rcu_note_context_switch() instead of
rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch(), which didn't show up until
,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sta...@kernel.org
Bcc:
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.17 00/25] 3.17.1-stable review
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: 20141013082319.175d90bb@as
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 08:23:19AM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 08:28:35 -0300
Henrique de
To: 09f6edd424218eb69078551b2ecfada1f2d098eb
To: Chuck Ebbert cebbert.l...@gmail.com
Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@hmh.eng.br,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sta...@kernel.org
Bcc:
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.17 00/25] 3.17.1-stable review
Reply-To:
In-Reply
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 09:22:35AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
From a80e49e2cc3145af014a8ae44f575829cc236192 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com
Subject: nohz: Move nohz full init call to tick init
From c5c38ef3d70377dc504a6a3f611a3ec814bc757b Mon
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 01:13:27AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 09:22:35AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
From a80e49e2cc3145af014a8ae44f575829cc236192 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com
Subject: nohz: Move nohz full init
At Tue, 14 Oct 2014 05:26:07 +0200,
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 04:39:11AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 08:19:56AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On 10/12/2014 07:24 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > >This is the start of the stable
At Tue, 14 Oct 2014 05:26:07 +0200,
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 04:39:11AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 08:19:56AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/12/2014 07:24 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 04:39:11AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 08:19:56AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 10/12/2014 07:24 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1 release.
> > >There are 25 patches in this
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 02:35:41PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 10/12/2014 08:24 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1 release.
> > There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 08:19:56AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/12/2014 07:24 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1 release.
> >There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >to this one. If anyone has any
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 08:23:19AM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> Stalls when using nohz, requires series of six patches to fix that
> didn't make 3.17 and weren't marked for -stable:
>
> From a80e49e2cc3145af014a8ae44f575829cc236192 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Frederic Weisbecker
> Subject:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 05:03:46PM -0400, George Spelvin wrote:
> Romain Francoise wrote:
> > Commit 1c40279960 ("libata: Un-break ATA blacklist") is apparently not
> > included, is in Linus' tree since Friday, and is rather urgent.
>
> As the patch author, I agree. If nothing else, I'd like to
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 05:25:14PM +0200, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
> wrote:
> >
> > I am not complaining that the patch hasn't made it to 3.17.1 (or even
> > mainline) yet.
>
> Hmm. It's been in mainline.since last Friday, afaik.
Now
Romain Francoise wrote:
> Commit 1c40279960 ("libata: Un-break ATA blacklist") is apparently not
> included, is in Linus' tree since Friday, and is rather urgent.
As the patch author, I agree. If nothing else, I'd like to be able to take
off this brown paper bag.
--
To unsubscribe from this
On 10/12/2014 08:24 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses
On 10/13/2014 08:44 AM, Romain Francoise wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 04:24:53AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1 release.
There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 04:24:53AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
wrote:
>
> I am not complaining that the patch hasn't made it to 3.17.1 (or even
> mainline) yet.
Hmm. It's been in mainline.since last Friday, afaik.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On 10/12/2014 07:24 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1 release.
There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 08:28:35 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2014, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1
> > release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted
> > as a response to this one. If anyone
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Actually, 3.17 is
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1 release.
There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Actually, 3.17 is a
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 08:28:35 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@hmh.eng.br wrote:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1
release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted
as a response to this one. If
On 10/12/2014 07:24 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1 release.
There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
h...@hmh.eng.br wrote:
I am not complaining that the patch hasn't made it to 3.17.1 (or even
mainline) yet.
Hmm. It's been in mainline.since last Friday, afaik.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 04:24:53AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1 release.
There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
On 10/13/2014 08:44 AM, Romain Francoise wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 04:24:53AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1 release.
There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues
On 10/12/2014 08:24 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1 release.
There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should
Romain Francoise rom...@orebokech.com wrote:
Commit 1c40279960 (libata: Un-break ATA blacklist) is apparently not
included, is in Linus' tree since Friday, and is rather urgent.
As the patch author, I agree. If nothing else, I'd like to be able to take
off this brown paper bag.
--
To
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 05:25:14PM +0200, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
h...@hmh.eng.br wrote:
I am not complaining that the patch hasn't made it to 3.17.1 (or even
mainline) yet.
Hmm. It's been in mainline.since last Friday, afaik.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 05:03:46PM -0400, George Spelvin wrote:
Romain Francoise rom...@orebokech.com wrote:
Commit 1c40279960 (libata: Un-break ATA blacklist) is apparently not
included, is in Linus' tree since Friday, and is rather urgent.
As the patch author, I agree. If nothing else,
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 08:23:19AM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
Stalls when using nohz, requires series of six patches to fix that
didn't make 3.17 and weren't marked for -stable:
From a80e49e2cc3145af014a8ae44f575829cc236192 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Frederic Weisbecker
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 08:19:56AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/12/2014 07:24 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1 release.
There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 02:35:41PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
On 10/12/2014 08:24 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1 release.
There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 04:39:11AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 08:19:56AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/12/2014 07:24 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1 release.
There are 25 patches in this series, all
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1 release.
There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed Oct 15 02:24:45 UTC 2014.
Anything
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1 release.
There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed Oct 15 02:24:45 UTC 2014.
Anything
48 matches
Mail list logo
